Horoscope Fish
Senior Member
I hadn't thought of it in just those words, but yeah... I think that's pretty spot-on.I would commend Nikon for the D7200, but realistically it's the camera the D7100 should've been all along!
....
I hadn't thought of it in just those words, but yeah... I think that's pretty spot-on.I would commend Nikon for the D7200, but realistically it's the camera the D7100 should've been all along!
I think I'm gonna save some money and get the D7200 with the 18-105mm instead of the 18-140mm. As Don says it works great plus for anything further I have my 55-300mm so I'll be good.
No idea.Is that your final decision![]()
Already about 200 bucks off if you get the kit lens. Nice. Too bad the Canadian Amazon doesn't have this to pre-order yet.FYI, pre-order is available on Amazon: Amazon.com : Nikon D7200 DX-format DSLR w/ 18-140mm VR Lens (Black) : Camera & Photo
Wanna know why it seems that way? Well, for one thing your perception is not too far from the reality...... Nikon makes it tough to enjoy what you have, because it seems like every few months they come out with a newer model to make you feel like you need to upgrade.
I am very happy with my D7100, and want to stick with FX. I could use an extra body to replace my aging D70, which I use for backup and just because I like to carry two bodies so I don't have to swap lenses. I'm going to hold off for a while, though, until the reviews are in and RAW software has been updated. If the focusing and low light performance is truly improved to a significant degree, I'll probably bite.
Punctuation would help a lot here...I just ordered a 5300 think it's worth the upgrade from the D5300 to a 7200 I paid $500 for the 5300 refurbished from comets so the 7200 would be twice the price ?
Based purely on image quality?Comparing camera to camera how much better in image quality is the 7200 vs the 5300. I know the 7200 isn't out yet but from rumors and such will there be much of a difference ?