I have not read anything that indicates the D7200 has Group Area AF.So let me get this straight, there is no group area AF like on the D4s, d810 and D750?
No, I figured that would have made it down to the D7200 since it has been labeled as a "flagship"I have not read anything that indicates the D7200 has Group Area AF.
Is this something you were holding out for?
....
I would say the improved low-light auto-focus and broader ISO range. The D7200 has a native ISO range of 100-25600, which is 2EV higher than the ISO 100-6400 of the D7100. That, combined with the improved AF system, goes beyond the "nice to have" column, in my opinion... Those are some solid improvements.- I like the bigger buffer since I will be using it a lot for my kids' sports. Other than that, what are the real world differences between the two?
No hard facts but I would expect to be waiting a few months *at least*.- Currently the D7100 is $1,200 retail but about $1,000 on Amazon. How long does it take for those deals to hit? How long before refurbs are available?
The '7200, in my opinion, corrects the one really glaring flaw in it's predecessor and that's the buffer issue. That really does cripple the D7100 in some respects. You can argue not everyone needs a deeper buffer, but the fact is with the D7100 being the "flagship" DX body, the buffer simply should not have been hobbled like it was. The improved ISO and AF system are not to be sneezed at either. As I see it, those are three pretty significant points in favor of the D7200. If I were in the market for a DX body I'd be swayed pretty hard by these upgrades. Still, the D7100 is an outstanding body; the D7200, as you would expect is just a BETTER body but I couldn't assign a specific dollar value to how much better it is.- Any opinions on what is the better camera for the money, D7100 or D7200?
The icon at the top states 36.3 but the text indicates 24.2 in a couple places. It's just a typo I'm sure.Think nikon got this wrong,until they change it this page says the D7200 has a 36.3 mp sensor,unless thats a leak for the D400
Nikon | Imaging Products | Nikon D7200
Think nikon got this wrong,until they change it this page says the D7200 has a 36.3 mp sensor,unless thats a leak for the D400
Nikon | Imaging Products | Nikon D7200
Even if I was going from the D3100 right now, I would probably get a refurb 7100 and a refurb 18-140mm combo.I got an email alert from B&H this morning... ~$1200 for the body, and only $300 more for the 18-140 bundle.
d7200 | B&H Photo Video
It's nice, especially with a bigger buffer and expeed 4, but there's no temptation for me with the D7100 right now. I don't do a whole lot of burst scenarios outside of the 5-6 rapid fire shots I get now, but this listing says up to 100 frames, (DPreview says it's up to 27 frames shooting RAW) so... BIG difference right there! Built in Wi-Fi too, but that's to be expected these days.
Great buy right there, Nikon refurb D7100 bodies are currently $699.Even if I was going from the D3100 right now, I would probably get a refurb 7100 and a refurb 18-140mm combo.
I think I'd already decided on a D750 as my next body; this makes the decision more certain. I like my D7100, but the D7200 isn't enough to keep me in the DX camp.
Looks to have the same AF module as the D750
I recently jumped from D7100 to D750 myself. My advice? DO IT. Do it now.I think I'd already decided on a D750 as my next body; this makes the decision more certain. I like my D7100, but the D7200 isn't enough to keep me in the DX camp.
I recently jumped from D7100 to D750 myself. My advice? DO IT. Do it now.
....