Quite frankly, to finally get 45MP sensor and new glass that can keep up with it(!!!!!) and then an AF 50 with whopping f/0.95 and VR thanks to the sensor gimmick - this honestly beats Fuji for bokehliciousness. And out EL15's to keep up with power demands unlike Fuji's dinky cells.
I agree with you, but at what price... Between the Nikon 50 .95 and the Fuji 56 1.2, I'm not certain the bokeh difference will be that much. But the price though...
I'm not trying to start an argument, but the Fuji' size and weight, lens quality and IQ makes it a serious option. At our local photo club, I've see quite a bit of people switching fro Nikon FX to Fuji and I haven't seen one go back yet.
I have both and have to say that both have their advantages and weaknesses. But I have so much Nikon old glass that I'm not going to go with another lens mount as of yet. I remember switching from Canon to Nikon because of their lens mount change.
The 45 mp files certainly have their use for some photographers, but not for me. I have enough MPs with my D810.
I think I'm all good for now with my Df, D810, D7200, X-E2 and X-T2... After all I've only got 2 hands.