Which way did your fine tuning have to go??
If you are manually focusing check to see if your diopter has been bumped and clanged. The best way to check it is to look at the numbers and letters at the bottom of your viewfinder and adjust you diopter to make these letters and numbers in sharp focus.
Don't discount that you are moving from a 16MP camera with an OLPF to a 24MP camera without. Yes, it will be a sharper camera, but it will also show weaknesses in the lens that the other might not. Your pixel density is even greater than that of the D810, so if there is any movement it will result in a loss of sharpness, and as you start closing the aperture a bit (which you need to on that lens) you will experience diffraction.
Which way did your fine tuning have to go??
I have a horror story I could regale everyone with related to FoCal. At first I thought it was fantastic, loved it! But then I realized my shots were looking worse for having used FoCal. So, wanting to get things done right, I hauled everything to one the art studios on the campus where I work so I could set everything up under ideal, indoor conditions. Long story short... It was a disaster. I sent Reikan some of my reports and they agreed the results were horribly, even bizarrely, inconsistent. After several emails back and forth, I was issued a refund, even though my purchase was outside the usual 60-day return window.I've used Fo-Cal and the fine tuning results are not consistent...
I have a horror story I could regale everyone with related to FoCal. At first I thought it was fantastic, loved it! But then I realized my shots were looking worse for having used FoCal. So, wanting to get things done right, I hauled everything to one the art studios on the campus where I work so I could set everything up under ideal, indoor conditions. Long story short... It was a disaster. I sent Reikan some of my reports and they agreed the results were horribly, even bizarrely, inconsistent. After several emails back and forth, I was issued a refund, even though my purchase was outside the usual 60-day return window.
I now do all my calibration manually using these instructions and I couldn't be happier with the results.
....
...not use the D7100 as a clay pigeonThat's good to hear.
WM
Raw and I use lightroom for PPKevin please dont be insulted if i ask the obvious but are you shooting raw or jpeg,there is detail in the images but not sharp detail,if your shooting jpeg or raw and using the auto convert in view nx have you set the sharpening in your camera.
Those tree shots are looking pretty respectable considering they were shot at ISO 2000. There might be some room for improvement but I'm not familiar enough with with the Sigma 150-500mm to know just how much one can expect from it.Raw and I use lightroom for PP
Those tree shots are looking pretty respectable considering they were shot at ISO 2000. There might be some room for improvement but I'm not familiar enough with with the Sigma 150-500mm to know just how much one can expect from it.
Did you do any sharpening in post'?
....
Had some time at work today and found a tree these are the most detail have got so far but I shot the 150-500 at 150mm hand held left arm rested on window of truck now that I can see some detail I'll take the time to properly fine tune it and not use the D7100 as a clay pigeon
Cropped a bit
Cropped alot
I had a problem several years ago with my Nikon 70-300VR lens. When I bought it I also purchased a UV filter to go on it. All my pictures were soft and never gave me any sharp pictures and I was very dissatisfied with my results. On the way to sell this lens I decided to remove the filter and take a few shots of a tree just like you did. The result from removing the filter was drastically improved. I never knew there was a difference but they had given me a UV filter for a film camera. I went back and swapped it for a digital filter and now I get very nice sharp pictures. My suggestion would be if you have filters on any lens that you are having issues with is to take them off and see what the difference is. This may not have anything to do with this problem but is some good information to know.