I think you have bumped your head...
I think you are blind...
I think you have bumped your head...
Doug....by then, the 810 will be a 820. But you could buy an 810 at a reduced rate.
I think you are blind...
Don't spread mis information ... It is only your twisted opinion ... Not sure why you are spewing such negativity about a camera that has won so many awards this year.. Maybe it's you and not the camera.. No muddy images this way ...
Ok, I am not here to argue with anyone. BUT only if you take both cameras side by side and take the same shot by the same settings you will understand what I mean.
Don't bells & whistles count for anything?
Sure but none of us sees the difference in 0.5bit color, 18/24 or 19/24 sharpness or 0.2EV DR range. Subjectively the one color might look better than the other but that can't be objectively quantified.
If we have to look at a blown up shot with a magnifying glass, that only shows how trivial it is.
I like the D750 very much. It's a fantastic cam at every level. Well almost every level.
But that it is so much worse than an older model is a bit hard to believe. Technology usually moves forward not backwards. Else we'll be living in caves again within a century.
I obviously don't own one....but I'd have to say from what I've read, it is very pricey for the minor upgrades in quality.
That depends what you upgrade from. In my case it was worth all the money. If you have a D600-D610, it might make more sense to wait. It's for everyone different I guess.
Well....actually....I made a mistake....the equivalent camera from Canon that Popular Photography compares the D750 to, costs more than $500 more than the D750. I guess Nikon IS cheaper than that.
I've already forgotten what I paid for my D750.
...
Actually....Popular Photography said the D750 would save you over $1000 when compared to Canon's 5D Mark III.