Nikon D500 Announced

Vincent

Senior Member
I believe spec wise the D500 is compared to uninteresting specs of the 7d MkII.


So the one that cought my attention before was the Samsung NX1 (BSI did not deliver on the ISO tests, beating the D7200 with only 30 points on DXO Mark).
Camera Format APS-C (1.5x Crop Factor)
Max Resolution 28 MP: 6480 x 4320 BSI => fail for the D500
Bit Depth 14-bit
Dust Reduction System Yes
Memory Card Type SD
Image Stabilization Optical
Autofocus Points Phase Detection: 205 => fail for the D500
Contrast Detection: 209
Viewfinder Coverage 100%
Viewfinder Magnification Approx. 1.04x => fail for the D500
Diopter Adjustment - 4 to +2 m => fail for the D500
Display Screen 3" Rear Touchscreen Tilting AMOLED (1,036,000) => D500 wins
ISO Sensitivity Auto, 100-25600 (Extended Mode: 100-51200) => D500 wins
Shutter 30 - 1/8000 seconds in Manual Mode
Max Sync Speed Electronic Shutter: 1 / 250 seconds
Continuous Shooting Up to 15 fps => fail for the D500
Weight 19.4 oz / 550 g => fail for the D500


However I believe we will see a similar effect then with the 7d MkII and the NX1, less specs but more performance.
Wait and see though if the D500 specs deliver.
 

Woodyg3

Senior Member
Contributor
I believe spec wise the D500 is compared to uninteresting specs of the 7d MkII.


So the one that cought my attention before was the Samsung NX1 (BSI did not deliver on the ISO tests, beating the D7200 with only 30 points on DXO Mark).
Camera Format APS-C (1.5x Crop Factor)
Max Resolution 28 MP: 6480 x 4320 BSI => fail for the D500
Bit Depth 14-bit
Dust Reduction System Yes
Memory Card Type SD
Image Stabilization Optical
Autofocus Points Phase Detection: 205 => fail for the D500
Contrast Detection: 209
Viewfinder Coverage 100%
Viewfinder Magnification Approx. 1.04x => fail for the D500
Diopter Adjustment - 4 to +2 m => fail for the D500
Display Screen 3" Rear Touchscreen Tilting AMOLED (1,036,000) => D500 wins
ISO Sensitivity Auto, 100-25600 (Extended Mode: 100-51200) => D500 wins
Shutter 30 - 1/8000 seconds in Manual Mode
Max Sync Speed Electronic Shutter: 1 / 250 seconds
Continuous Shooting Up to 15 fps => fail for the D500
Weight 19.4 oz / 550 g => fail for the D500


However I believe we will see a similar effect then with the 7d MkII and the NX1, less specs but more performance.
Wait and see though if the D500 specs deliver.

The Samsung has a VERY limited lens selection, and in real world tests on sports, the hit rate on focus has been pretty bad.

The Canon 7D MK II is really the only competition in the DX sports/wildlife market, IMO.

I agree, though, that we have to see the D500 in real world action before we can really know how it stacks up.
 

Nero

Senior Member
Did this Brand Ambassador or the Nikon Marketing dept write this 'impartial review'??:D
Lol All i know is he is apparently a music photographer. The impartialness of the review is up to everyone to pointlessly debate about. Nikon fans will say it's legit, Canon fanboys will make claims of complete bias and wondering how much Nikon supposedly paid this guy to say such nice things. And mirrorless users will be mirrorless users. Haha

Sent from my SM-N920W8 using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:

egosbar

Senior Member
not fixing the memory bank issues is a problem for me , ill stick to user 1 and user 2 on my 7100 until they fix this i wont be buying an upgrade camera , i still cant see why the memory banks dont have a default save it seems like they are wasted to me

what i want is to know exactly all my start up settings without doubt ie exposure comp might not set on 0 or flash comp might not set on 0 etc , by turning my dial away from user 1 and back i know every setting is defaulted back to what i set up.

is there a setting on the ff or d500 that i can do this?
 
Last edited:

egosbar

Senior Member
isnt nikon listening to this problem , it is highly discussed a memory bank that when you change settings while shooting it saves what you change lol , wasted very relative feature
 

Blacktop

Senior Member
isnt nikon listening to this problem , it is highly discussed a memory bank that when you change settings while shooting it saves what you change lol , wasted very relative feature

I have not heard of this problem before. I'm used to using U1 and U2 on my D7100 and 750 which like @egosbar says, after switching from the User mode and then back, it defaults to whatever was saved to it the last time.
 

mikew_RIP

Senior Member
Nikon IMO have done a great job on paper (we need real world results) of bringing a camera out that will meet the needs of the majority of top end DX shooters,nothing can be everything to every one,fortunately for me it is so over spec for what i need i am not at the moment looking to get one.
That could change of course because in all honesty its not the over specified that stops me its the price which does seam fair for a camera in that position in the market place its just more than i want to spend on a body.
 

Nero

Senior Member
Nikon IMO have done a great job on paper (we need real world results) of bringing a camera out that will meet the needs of the majority of top end DX shooters,nothing can be everything to every one,fortunately for me it is so over spec for what i need i am not at the moment looking to get one.
That could change of course because in all honesty its not the over specified that stops me its the price which does seam fair for a camera in that position in the market place its just more than i want to spend on a body.
I know the feeling. Lol

Sent from my SM-N920W8 using Tapatalk
 

egosbar

Senior Member
I have not heard of this problem before. I'm used to using U1 and U2 on my D7100 and 750 which like @egosbar says, after switching from the User mode and then back, it defaults to whatever was saved to it the last time.

yeah one of the first things i noticed when shooting with a borrowed d800 , i like to know exactly where im starting from , apparently the memory banks have been like it for 10 years , a lot of people dont worry about it but most user 1 and 2 shooter s see the value and having four that you can custom name would be awesome , hopefully they listen one day and set them so they are usable because it really does turn me off and keeps me waiting , the d500 with that feature and id probably be forced to buy one lol
 

mikew_RIP

Senior Member
Nikon rumors shows some screen shots of the back of a D500 at high ISO.
Nikon D500 high ISO sample (LCD screenshots only) | Nikon Rumors

This does not say a lot (screen + well lit environment), but 51200 ISO shows clear detail on the screen which does give hope.
Anyone who wants to do a similar shot of a D7200 or 7D Mark II?

I wish all my D7200 shots looked as good on the computer as they do on the camera back :D looking at them there noise is not a problem and i never have a focus or DOF issue :confused: do you think it could be a card reader problem.
 

mikew_RIP

Senior Member
Something to consider on pricing,three prices including gray on other Nikon bodies,the gray price is not the cheapest i can find its from a reputable shop based dealer with a 3 year warranty

Model body only------ Nikon price------ main dealer price------ gray price

D810-------------------- £2699------------ £2349------------------- £1585

D750------------------- £1799------------- £1396------------------- £1079

D7200----------------- £939--------------- £751---------------------£599

D500------------------ £1729-------------- £1729------------------- £????????

Just a quick look tells you a gray 810 with a 3 year warranty is cheaper than D500 at dealer price,something will give somewhere:D
 
Last edited:

Ironwood

Senior Member
:(, I think the price may be a killer for me.
I have never bought a grey body, lenses yes but I always pay the extra for piece of mind on bodies. If I want one of these grey might be the only option, or wait for 2nd hand ones to start hitting the market .
 

salukfan111

Senior Member
Nikon rumors shows some screen shots of the back of a D500 at high ISO.
Nikon D500 high ISO sample (LCD screenshots only) | Nikon Rumors

This does not say a lot (screen + well lit environment), but 51200 ISO shows clear detail on the screen which does give hope.
Anyone who wants to do a similar shot of a D7200 or 7D Mark II?
It's best just to wait. It should be an easy matter to objectively test the D500, D5, D810, D750, D7200 on a level playing field. Nikon better be careful though, and not tank the D750 and D7200. I used to think the D7200 was the greatest camera innovation for no other reason that it's release drove down D7100 prices into reach of hobby goers. This new camera might put D750s and D7100s into the reach of the common joe six pack shooter and push D610s, D7000s, D700s down to where no one should be able to justify buying a D3xxx or D5xxx.
 

Vincent

Senior Member
It's best just to wait. It should be an easy matter to objectively test the D500, D5, D810, D750, D7200 on a level playing field. Nikon better be careful though, and not tank the D750 and D7200. I used to think the D7200 was the greatest camera innovation for no other reason that it's release drove down D7100 prices into reach of hobby goers. This new camera might put D750s and D7100s into the reach of the common joe six pack shooter and push D610s, D7000s, D700s down to where no one should be able to justify buying a D3xxx or D5xxx.

Not clear how the evolution of the other models will be. Somehow I have the feeling there will be a clean up (less models).
After the D3 - D700 issue I`m convinced Nikon did have a plan before releasing the D750 and D500.
 

mikew_RIP

Senior Member
Not clear how the evolution of the other models will be. Somehow I have the feeling there will be a clean up (less models).
After the D3 - D700 issue I`m convinced Nikon did have a plan before releasing the D750 and D500.

There is a novel idea,Nikon with a plan:D could be dangerous.
 
Top