Re: 610 vs 7100
Good luck with the decision, for what it's worth if I could only have one it would be the 600/610. I shoot portraits, sports, flowers and just about everything except landscapes. Wish I could offer more for you.
I bought the d600 for the image quality that this camera can produce. It was eventually replaced with the d610 by nikon.
Paired up with the right lenses, this camera is excellent.
But... The d610 with a subpar lens compared to a d7100 with a superb lens that cost about the same as the mediocre fx lens actually creates a better image. That's what I have seen anyway, thus me asking the questions. I don't have a big trust fund or make that kind of money to buy the nikon kings. When I purchased full frame in the first place, I thought kit lens at f8-f11 would be as good as the 24-70 at f8. I was shown wrong. But put that 24-85 on a d7100 and it's in the same ballpark. Again, that's what I have been shown. I haven't done the test myself due to a lack of camera shop in my area and lack of having both cameras in hand. If I had that, I would more than likely keep both.
I didn't expect this to be that complicated or complex question to tell you the truth. I thought someone who has both cameras could describe and maybe show the differences between cameras using same settings and same kit lens
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Good luck with the decision, for what it's worth if I could only have one it would be the 600/610. I shoot portraits, sports, flowers and just about everything except landscapes. Wish I could offer more for you.