BackdoorArts
Senior Member
Hmmm, now you have me thinking. My buddy, whose bike I'm changing the oil on this evening, is a graphic artist. How many oil changes do I need to do to get a free logo design? LOL
Hmmm, now you have me thinking. My buddy, whose bike I'm changing the oil on this evening, is a graphic artist. How many oil changes do I need to do to get a free logo design? LOL
You're clearly missing the idea of my post. What's the point of putting a 'watermark', an incorrect description of what exists here, if it's so removeable. Digital images are virtually impossible to mark with indelible, unremoveable footprints - they can, but not easily - so why do it in the first place?
A bona-fide end-user would not be interested in copying the image for their own purposes, and the plagiarism of material, by those who would, is'nt going to be stopped by adding a 'logo'.
Watermarks, added images to jpg's, do not work as a means of 'protecting' the image. And I'm unclear as to why they are used.
All photo-agencies require any logo's to be removed, and as yet I've not seen an image in a professional magazine with a logo on it.
Watermarks, added images to jpg's, do not work as a means of 'protecting' the image. And I'm unclear as to why they are used. All photo-agencies require any logo's to be removed, and as yet I've not seen an image in a professional magazine with a logo on it. For hard-copy proof you can do something like this, but remember if you are paid to take photographs the ownership of the images rest with the payer (the employer) not the photographer, unless a prior contract arrangement exists.
View attachment 34929
I removed my previous post. Tony.
I'm on a Mac (and PC) and the easiest solution for me is on output processing from Lightroom using Mogrify as described earlier. Are you using a catalog/asset managing program (e.g. Aperture, Lightroom, ACDSee, etc.)?