I really don't like photoshop or elements, Lightroom was so much more intuitive to me. I know I will improve with them but at the end of the month free trial I know which programme I'll be choosing. Anyway this Curlew was edited in Photoshop and I have no idea if I've got the best out of it.
View attachment 163184
I really don't like photoshop or elements, Lightroom was so much more intuitive to me. I know I will improve with them but at the end of the month free trial I know which programme I'll be choosing. Anyway this Curlew was edited in Photoshop and I have no idea if I've got the best out of it.
View attachment 163184
You can sharpen a bit more when using the High Pass filter and blend but you will have to erase the parts that start fringing.
A quick and dirty attempt at your JPEG. You can do more with the original file. This one got too low quality to really enhance. 82KB ain't much data.
View attachment 163311
To fix blur or out of focus you need an algorithm that does exactly that but even those only fix to a degree.
Question; what JPEG quality do you save? You best use max quality. Looking at your file-size I assume you use 60-70%?
To me, photo editors are for enhancing shots . Trying to fix an out of focus shot in any editor is a lost cause IMHO. Also, LR and PS are two different editors made to do different things.
Do you think this shot is out of focus? My thoughts were that it was a little soft because the lens isn't the sharpest, the light was quite soft and it is cropped quite a bit. I will check the focus of my lens in the next day or two to see if it needs fine tuning. I agree any programme is there to enhance the shot, its just that to me Lightroom is far far more user friendly, so I felt confident I could get the result I wanted.
Not the whole shot, but the eyes look very soft to me. I didn't mean it to come off as an insult or anything. It's not easy to get a BIF shot in 100% in focus, I just thought you were blaming the editor .
I'm not even sure what quality this was saved in from photoshop. I've only just started using it and I find it difficult to figure out the simplist of things. With Lightroom I knew exactly what quality and file size I was exporting, with this I'm essentially clueless.
I have the Nikon 70-300mm too, its a good lens, not GReat, but its a good lens, IMO your focus isnt off target but it looks sharper at the tail than the eye, there is some wing blur clearly at the tips,Do you think this shot is out of focus? My thoughts were that it was a little soft because the lens isn't the sharpest, the light was quite soft and it is cropped quite a bit. I will check the focus of my lens in the next day or two to see if it needs fine tuning. I agree any programme is there to enhance the shot, its just that to me Lightroom is far far more user friendly, so I felt confident I could get the result I wanted.
I have the Nikon 70-300mm too, its a good lens, not GReat, but its a good lens, IMO your focus isnt off target but it looks sharper at the tail than the eye, there is some wing blur clearly at the tips,
but from what I see around , few people really try to totally 'freeze the wings'. Your shutter speed of 1/1000th is a bit slow for that size bird and distance, IMO you'd rather be about 1/2000th but what numbers you use depends on angle and distance and in the end one fudges out what gives them the best results most often.
The adjustments Jsee made ,do look good, at the scale I can see it. The increased contrast from the high pass filter helps delineate the feathers.
I do like the crop, it gives the bird room to move, shows the scene , you could soften the look of the grass in the background if you feel its just a tad more distracting than you want, (most folks seem to like that really blurred background ,, but your taste does matter).. with clarity slider in ACR , or isolate it and blur ( gaussian appx 1-2 pixels) ... again , most things are subjective choice. The one thing that I do judge harsh on the pic and is unalterable that the bird is heading away and looking away. Cool bird, nice light and background,,,,, but that orientation of the subject is vital for maintaining interest in a bird pic.
Thats just My 2 Cents