My bird shots are just horrible! I need some help!

Bill16

Senior Member
I doubt I'm smart enough to figure that out! Lol But I think it's great! I'm one of the people that think that Nikon should put out a pro DX! I think it would be popular! :D
I didn't say you wrote anything about a lack of quality. All I was saying was that Sigma has put a lot of time in money on a pro lens specifically for a DX body. A ground breaking lens at that. I find that interesting and would be keen to understand why they went with that strategy.
 

Mike D90

Senior Member
I didn't say you wrote anything about a lack of quality. All I was saying was that Sigma has put a lot of time in money on a pro lens specifically for a DX body. A ground breaking lens at that. I find that interesting and would be keen to understand why they went with that strategy.


It is interesting as I would think that eventually DX format would kind of go away. Unless there is a way to make the DX sensor a lot better.
 

480sparky

Senior Member
It is interesting as I would think that eventually DX format would kind of go away. Unless there is a way to make the DX sensor a lot better.

Compare the D90 to the D7100.
fiufiu.gif
 

dramtastic

Senior Member
It is interesting as I would think that eventually DX format would kind of go away. Unless there is a way to make the DX sensor a lot better.

You'd more likely see FX dumped before you saw DX. The vast majority of sales are DX bodies. Down the track when there is larger range of lenses for mirrorless bodies, they may take over the majority of sales.
DX bodies apart from having a cropped sensor have features as advanced and some times more advanced than FX bodies from 5-6 years ago at a far more affordable price than a new FX. I can only say for my purposes, mainly shooting wildlife, a DX sensor is a better option and that is the same for many a wildlife Pro shooter.
 

Mike D90

Senior Member
Wow, I am loving the LightRoom!

I was going to toss this image in the trash can. LightRoom transformed this photo completely. Not the best I could do but now it is useable. Actually I don't think it is that bad now!

This image was terribly fuzzy at the edges where it needed to be sharp. There was a lot of high ISO noise to the background and the water had no clarity at all.


Before:

Egret 001_original.jpg


After:


Egret 001.jpg
 
Last edited:

Mike D90

Senior Member
And it allowed me to get this photo good enough that I added some better sky, to the background, from another image.

I actually like this photo now.


Before:

Buzzard 01.jpg



After:


Buzzard under Clouds.jpg
 

Scott Murray

Senior Member
Wow, I am loving the LightRoom!

I was going to toss this image in the trash can. LightRoom transformed this photo completely. Not the best I could do but now it is useable. Actually I don't think it is that bad now!

This image was terribly fuzzy at the edges where it needed to be sharp. There was a lot of high ISO noise to the background and the water had no clarity at all.


Before:

View attachment 62528


After:


View attachment 62525

You could even try reducing the highlights and see how that turns out ;-)
 

Mike D90

Senior Member
This is a lot more like what I am looking for. Thanks to all of you and your advice I have finally taken an image I am proud of.

More to come. I have to go back to work.


Great Egret 01.jpg
 

That Steve Guy

New member
Thank you sir! What is "PP"? Pixel Peeping? And what shadow are you mentioning?

I wish some other species would show up out there. I am a little bored with the Titmouse and the Chickadee. The Redbirds are nice but they are a lot harder to get into the camera's viewfinder. They are skiddish.

Cardinals love cracked corn. We feed our chickens cracked corn and the cardinals clean up what is left. They are plump, slow moving, and always hang around for a feeding when the humans come out. Even have cardinals that roost inside the chicken coop.
 

Mike D90

Senior Member
Beautiful capture Mike and nicely processed. We need a thumbs up icon.

awesome shot!!! looks like you are on your way now...Thanks for sharing...love it

Very cool my friend! Great catch Mike! :D

Thank you all! Brian, what amazed me was I needed almost no processing. All I did was a little exposure adjustment, some saturation adjustment to kill some of the ugly winter grass color and a crop. I didn't have to sharpen at all and no noise reduction.

What I did today was find that sweet spot you been telling me was there. I got a good bit closer and backed off the zoom a little to about 280mm instead of 300mm, I kept my aperture at or above f/8 and a fast shutter above 1/1000th. ISO never dropped below 800 and was usually lower. Also by getting close it changed the angle the light was hitting the bird and the shadows were just nearly perfect.
 

Mike D90

Senior Member
Here are some more from today.

I wanted some flight shots be he was apparently just wanting to stand there sunning himself.




Great Egret 02.jpg

Great Egret 03.jpg

Great Egret 04.jpg

Great Egret 05.jpg

Great Egret 06.jpg
 
Last edited:
Top