Sounds like you have memory issues.I just did..............Why is it so hard to type a message on this website,I have to beat on the keyboard or wait a second between each key stroke ????????????????
Sounds like you have memory issues.I just did..............Why is it so hard to type a message on this website,I have to beat on the keyboard or wait a second between each key stroke ????????????????
I just did..............Why is it so hard to type a message on this website,I have to beat on the keyboard or wait a second between each key stroke ????????????????
I have tons of issues with this site and IE, such as not formatting my messages correctly, not being able to thank anyone, etc. Firefox works like a charm.not a website problem bigal
Wish I could afford it ShootRaw.Anybody else added the D610 from the D7100? Lovin my D610 and D7100 backup until I sell it...
Wish I could afford it ShootRaw.![]()
I opted to add the D800 to my existing D7100 back in December. Yes, more expensive but the focusing is closer to the D7100 and it has other "pro" features I felt the D600/D610 lacked. I actually still use the D7100 a lot. There are certain situations where it is the better choice for me.Anybody else added the D610 from the D7100? Lovin my D610 and D7100 backup until I sell it...
Focal length doesn't change. FOV changes due to the crop factor. DOF for a given focal length is actually greater on FX than it is on DX. People get really confused about this because camera companies use the term "equivalent focal length". Focal length of a lens is fixed no matter what sensor is behind it.That's cool...But one day my d610 will be my back-up to another fx camera..So no need for the D7100... besides I have gotten use to the fx focal length...Not having to back way up is great...Also having a true DOF is nice..My 1.4 is a true 1.4...vs a 2.1 aperture on dx...
Ummmm... No.Also having a true DOF is nice... My 1.4 is a true 1.4...vs a 2.1 aperture on dx...
Pretty much this... ^^^ Further, aperture has nothing to do with sensor size; f/1.4 is f/1.4 regardless.Focal length doesn't change. FOV changes due to the crop factor. DOF for a given focal length is actually greater on FX than it is on DX. People get really confused about this because camera companies use the term "equivalent focal length". Focal length of a lens is fixed no matter what sensor is behind it.
Focal length doesn't change. FOV changes due to the crop factor. DOF for a given focal length is actually greater on FX than it is on DX. People get really confused about this because camera companies use the term "equivalent focal length". Focal length of a lens is fixed no matter what sensor is behind it.
You have to multiply your aperture by the 1.5 crop factor as well..Just like you do for the FOV... So a 1.4 is not a true aperture on dx because of the crop factor...This is why the bokeh and DOF is slightly better on FX...Most people do not get that when throwing on fx lens onto their dx bodies.. I used the wrong lingo about the FOV earlier and said focal length..But you guy's knew what I meant..Ummmm... No.
Pretty much this... ^^^ Further, aperture has nothing to do with sensor size; f/1.4 is f/1.4 regardless.
...
You have to multiply your aperture by the 1.5 crop factor as well..Just like you do for the FOV... So a 1.4 is not a true aperture on dx because of the crop factor...This is why the bokeh and DOF is slightly better on FX...Most people do not get that when throwing on fx lens onto their dx bodies.. I used the wrong lingo about the FOV earlier and said focal length..But you guy's knew what I meant..
Are you saying that my 50mm f/1.8 on my DX is like a 50mm f/1.2 on an FX?