Jake's Backdoor Hippie-palooza, 2014 Edition

BackdoorArts

Senior Member
FYI, with the "channel swapped" images in the link above, you manually swap the Red and Blue light channels in Photoshop/Elements. It's a common methodology in IR photography (there are better explanations of the why's and what for's out on the web than I can give you here). It makes for a more dynamic looking image than the process I often use, which is a color mapping profile applied to my RAW file in Lightroom/ACR (this is applied in ACR the same way you would apply the Nikon Vivid or Nikon Landscape profiles - it's a custom profile called D7000 IR that my brother the camera genius built for me). It works much like a channel swap, but doesn't change the orientation of the colors in the image data. What I mean by that is that once you channel swap, Red is Blue and Blue is Red, so you need to think that whenever you play with color data because the computer things Red is still Red and Blue is still Blue.

I still use channel swapping, but it's a little more time consuming. It depends on what I want to do. If you look at the IR stuff in my Flickr pics the "cotton candy" photos are more channel swapped than the subtle blue & yellows I get from the profile method.
 

BackdoorArts

Senior Member
2014-030:

Not an awful lot of time today and almost thought I'd have an absolute throw away. Then I saw this little twisty headed owl thing my wife had on a lampstand. So now I don't have an absolute throw away, just something better than a food shot or another flower shot. :)

20140130-_D806798-Edit.jpg
 

BackdoorArts

Senior Member
Tried that one again this morning, just for kicks, and because I hate "throw-away's". Still not happy, but at least I'm still kicking after 30 days.

20140130-_D806798-Edit-2.jpg
 

Marcel

Happily retired
Staff member
Super Mod
Where did you get these frames Jake? To bad the square one does't have the famous Hasselblad notches. ;)
 

BackdoorArts

Senior Member
Where did you get these frames Jake? To bad the square one does't have the famous Hasselblad notches. ;)

They're in Nik Analog Efex Pro, Marcel. I love and hate that tool, because they have so many cool, vintage looks, but they're made up from a huge number of various filters and frames and it takes a while to sort out precisely what does what. But there are several film frames in there that I like a lot and sometimes I'll jump in there and turn off everything but the frame function. When I have time (yeah, right) I'll start creating some of my own "cameras" that are essentially just the Basic Adjustment, Bokeh, Vignette and Frame filters set certain ways for later use.
 

Marcel

Happily retired
Staff member
Super Mod
Thanks Jake. Yes, there are a lot of thing in that photo suite. It could take me months to discover all that is available... Well, I'm not in a hurry. :)
 

BackdoorArts

Senior Member
2014-031:

One month in the books. Proud of myself, and feel it's definitely helped my photography, making sure I pick up the camera every day.

This shot is reminiscent of one I took a couple weeks ago, but I like this one much better. Ash tree against a very stony, snow covered hillside. Can't decide which I like better. And for the picky, the ground is sloped and if you straighten it, the tree looks crooked. :)

20140131-_D622602-Edit.jpg
20140131-_D622602-EditB&W.jpg
 

BackdoorArts

Senior Member
2014-031(b):

Fotojack had an "HDR or not" thread earlier this week and in it we spoke about the dynamic range of the full frame Nikons. In it I did a quick and dirty +/-2EV HDR image using a single frame and making 2 virtual copies in LR, one +2EV and one -2EV. There was a situation today where the sun was peaking through the heavy cloud cover, so I exposed with making the frame an HDR. The nice thing about this is that there's zero ghosting. What do you think?

20140131-_D622606_HDR.jpg
 

BackdoorArts

Senior Member
I knew this was possible but yours is the best demonstration of that that i have seen to date.

That's very kind, Ron. The one thing I wanted to do but totally forgot to do was to save the final HDR Efex Pro 2 edit settings and then use it against just the 0EV frame and see the difference. I went back in afterward and will tell you that the default settings you start with doing a single frame tone map are nowhere near as dynamic as what I got sending 3 copies of the same image. I'll try this again and be far more careful about it and put something up in the HDR section when I get a chance.
 

hark

Administrator
Staff member
Super Mod
Contributor
2014-031:

One month in the books. Proud of myself, and feel it's definitely helped my photography, making sure I pick up the camera every day.

This shot is reminiscent of one I took a couple weeks ago, but I like this one much better. Ash tree against a very stony, snow covered hillside. Can't decide which I like better. And for the picky, the ground is sloped and if you straighten it, the tree looks crooked. :)

View attachment 70092View attachment 70093

2014-031(b):

Fotojack had an "HDR or not" thread earlier this week and in it we spoke about the dynamic range of the full frame Nikons. In it I did a quick and dirty +/-2EV HDR image using a single frame and making 2 virtual copies in LR, one +2EV and one -2EV. There was a situation today where the sun was peaking through the heavy cloud cover, so I exposed with making the frame an HDR. The nice thing about this is that there's zero ghosting. What do you think?

View attachment 70095

Between the first two photos, I prefer the color shot although both are terrific! We don't have much in the way of hills around here so I enjoy seeing yours. :)

And this last photo is awesome!!! :cool:
 

wud

Senior Member
I'm on the color version too. Really nice.

And wow. Had no idea HDR could be made that way but now you say it - of course! The image looks very similar to those other HDR shots you've posted. I like the composition :)


Sent from Tapatalk
 

BackdoorArts

Senior Member
I'm inclined to agree with the ladies this time (and many others). The thing that finally bent me to the color side was when I brightened the oranges in Lightroom and got the leftover leaves to pop. There are SO many blogs out there about making people look different in Photoshop, but if you realized just how much difference a Luminance slider can make in Lightroom you would laugh at the amount of PS work some folks do.
 

Lawrence

Senior Member
2014-031(b):

Fotojack had an "HDR or not" thread earlier this week and in it we spoke about the dynamic range of the full frame Nikons. In it I did a quick and dirty +/-2EV HDR image using a single frame and making 2 virtual copies in LR, one +2EV and one -2EV. There was a situation today where the sun was peaking through the heavy cloud cover, so I exposed with making the frame an HDR. The nice thing about this is that there's zero ghosting. What do you think?

View attachment 70095

If you really want to know what I think - AWESOME dude, just awesome!
 

wud

Senior Member
I'm inclined to agree with the ladies this time (and many others). The thing that finally bent me to the color side was when I brightened the oranges in Lightroom and got the leftover leaves to pop. There are SO many blogs out there about making people look different in Photoshop, but if you realized just how much difference a Luminance slider can make in Lightroom you would laugh at the amount of PS work some folks do.

Yeah. I do see LR being way faster than PS for loads of regular adjustments. Since you been telling so much about LR, I started using that instead of Bridge and its actually really good.
 
Top