Don Kuykendall_RIP
RIP :(
Sounds like one heck of a trip.
Can we misbehave in your absence or will there be a few deputies around?![]()
have at it. I am sure there are a few moderators here to keep you in check LOL
Sounds like one heck of a trip.
Can we misbehave in your absence or will there be a few deputies around?![]()
I have an 18-105mm
If I had money to burn i would also have a D750 ...
WE fly into LasVegas and drive to Zion first for a couple of days. Then on to Moab and while there we visit Arches, Dead Horse, Canyonlands and then we leave there and drive to the Grand Canyon where we have a private tour starting early morning and go till after sunset. Just the guide and Gloria and I. Then the next day we are on our own shooting in the area. Then back to LasVegas and then fly home.
We re also looking forward to possibly getting together with the Lady and Gentleman Moab and friend from that area while we are here and getting to shoot with them in Moab. I think I may get a few shots off in the 16 days we are gone
That sounds great!! Now, when you say "WE", does that mean you're taking me with you?![]()
No one is mentioning this, so I'm going to recommend Sigma 50-150 f/2.8. On a DX camera, it corresponds to the classic 70-200 f/2.8 lens. Image quality is fantastic, you can use it for portrait and street photography. It is a rare lens, out of production already, you can probably get a new one if you look around, or just find a good second-hand.
My personal DX "trinity" are (and these are lenses I actually use):
Tokina 11-16 f/2.8
Sigma 17-50 f/2.8
Sigma 50-150 f/2.8
They cover a whooping 11-150 mm at constant f/2.8. All three excellent image quality.
Change your subjects to wildlife and you only need two lenses,90mm macro and 150-600,now you can have a body for each.![]()
@Felisek I found one which seems ridiculously inexpensive.
Going to go and check out flickr to see some images.
Lawrence, there are at least 2 models of this lens, the older one does not have OS (VR). I think I remember reading its not as good optically as the newer one as well.@Felisek I found one which seems ridiculously inexpensive.
Going to go and check out flickr to see some images.
I had forgotten the Sigma 50-150mm... And what an awesome lens it is!Horoscope Fish had one in his old DX days. He recommended it to me. I don't regret following his recommendation.
Lawrence, there are at least 2 models of this lens, the older one does not have OS (VR). I think I remember reading its not as good optically as the newer one as well.
Shootraw was using one of the newer ones on a D7100 a while back and producing some great work with it, portraits and such. I think there was a dedicated thread for this lens.
I have been looking out for a good 2nd hand one as well, but I am hesitant because I might go FX one day, and in that case would be better off buying a Tamron 70-200 .
Edit- here it is http://nikonites.com/telephoto/1936...-os.html?highlight=sigma+50-150#axzz3imoLFZIB
He posted a lot more images somewhere, not in this thread obviously.
That's the older, non-OS version.