Rights Grabs: How to Protect Yourself

Browncoat

Senior Member
If you read the terms and conditions of just about any website, contest, or contract related to photography, odds are you've come across a rights grab. And if you participate in social media at all, you've been subjected to losing the rights to your work...and didn't even know it.

What is a rights grab?
Basically, it is an attempt to take away the most valuable aspect of your work as a photographer: your copyright. In short, contract language is used to pry ownership of your photo from where it belongs (in your hands) to someone else. This is usually accomplished in one of two ways:

  1. Complete transfer of all rights to another party.
  2. Creating some kind of general use license that essentially leaves you with nothing.
Because legal-speak is so difficult to decipher, I won't go into the gory details here. All disclaimers, terms of use, and contracts have different variations so it would be impossible to cover them all here. But there are key words to look for:

  • transfer
  • assign
  • license
  • irrevocable
  • distribute
  • sub-license
  • prepare derivative works
Coming across any of these is your cue to start reading much more carefully before signing on the dotted line. If you're really concerned about it, check with a lawyer first. Better safe than sorry.

Unsocial media
500 million people are on Facebook. It can be a powerful (and free) marketing tool to showcase your work, especially in conjunction with your own website. Flickr is another popular photo sharing website. Just be aware that 99% of the time, if you are using any service to share your work online, you have given up your ownership rights. Check the terms of service, it's in there.

These sites must legally get your permission to share your photos with the rest of the online community. They surely aren't going to pay you for any kind of license or usage, so there is a built-in transfer of power from you to them.

If you're using Facebook as a business tool, you must ask yourself if the image you are uploading are worth the potential risk of losing. Your work may be shared by others without your consent or knowledge and used in ways you don't approve of. Trust me, I've dealt with it firsthand.

Live events
Venues are getting smarter these days, as are performers. Even if you're hired as an official event photographer, you still may be subject to having to give up your work for free. It's becoming more an more common where management companies (such as promoters) are requiring photographers to sign an agreement where they can use your photos without having to pay for them.

For example, if you photograph a live band at a concert hall, the venue has all rights to use your work...and so does the band. Apple is currently developing infrared technology that will emit a signal during live concerts that will disable the camera on the iPhone. No more uploading photos and video of you and your friends on YouTube while at the concert.

What can you do about it?
1. The most obvious answer here is very simple: read the contract. If you can't make heads or tails of it, then don't sign or don't create an account for that online service. Once you sign, you're bound by the terms outlined in the contract, plain and simple. And you can be darned sure that it's not designed to be favorable to you in any way. This is true for any online photo sharing service, written contracts, and photo contests.

In terms of online services and contests, you have no bargaining power. You either accept or decline, period. But if you're working with a client, be prepared to negotiate. If this is a corporate client, you can be certain that their legal department has drawn up papers in their favor as well. This doesn't mean that the document is written in stone, however. I've found that most are willing to work with you.

2. You also need to make some honest assessments with your images. Don't think that you have to horde every photo you take. If you want to maintain some sort of stock library, you need to ask yourself if this particular image would be worth anything to another potential client.

Let's pretend you landed a job to photograph a small airline. They have about a dozen prop planes and a small staff. They've hired you to take some photos of their planes and portraits of the office people. The airline will want the rights to these photos so they can use them in promotional materials. Do you want to keep the rights for these photos? No, probably not. The photos aren't worth anything to anyone else.

3. Be smart and protect your online photos with embedded data. You can certainly watermark your images, but the real protection lies in the file info itself. Neither of these will prevent image theft, but it is somewhat of a deterrent. Put your copyright info in there along with your contact email or a phone number. Most publishers are vigilant when it comes to checking this data and will verify who the author is. If your work has been stolen and submitted by someone else for publishing, they need to know how to get in touch with you.

4. Don't be afraid to say no. Only you can determine if losing your rights is worth it or not. Is the pay high enough? Will you benefit from the exposure of winning a contest or being published? Is it really necessary to share this image online? You must be able to weigh the pros and cons and figure it out for yourself. Like I said before, if it doesn't really seem to be worth the trouble...it probably isn't.

5. Read some more. If you want some incredibly detailed info on all of this, here are a couple of great resources:

ASMP Professional Business Practices in Photography
Best Business Practices for Photographers
 
Last edited:
My Nikon D3100 has settings in the camera that put My info on each picture. I have it set but can that data be removed or changed by anyone else once the picture has been shot?
 

Browncoat

Senior Member
Yes, that data can be altered or even erased. There is no sure fire way to protect yourself against outright image theft online, except to not post images online at all. Anyone who wants your stuff that badly will know ways around the system.
 

ohkphoto

Snow White
Thanks for the info, Anthony. Nice to have this in a compact form in one place.

As a side note, Lady Gaga demands photographers turn over the copyrights of images of her to her. I'm assuming it's at performances.
 

Browncoat

Senior Member
I think the biggest danger in all of this is for the people who think it doesn't apply to them. The people who don't concern themselves with the rights to their photos because "it's just a hobby" and they share photos on Flickr just for fun.

One day they'll wake up and see their photo on a t-shirt and wonder what the hell just happened, and why they never got credit or paid. Like this guy:


 

ohkphoto

Snow White
I think the biggest danger in all of this is for the people who think it doesn't apply to them.

. . . and this is what makes it hard on all of us. The public gets mixed messages: " well, I can use so-and-so's photos for nothing, and you want to charge me how much??!!"
 

Carolina Photo Guy

Senior Member
You know something?

Google "Nikonites Red Flower Images".

13 images in the first 4 rows are MINE! Each image is "right clickable" at full resolution.

How can I post and keep my images mine?
 

jengajoh

Senior Member
I noticed this too Pete, if any of us search a picture we posted here on google images, you'll find it. I searched a few of my picture titles and found them on google.
 

Relax

New member
MobileMe terms: Apple - MobileMe - Terms of Service

"Except for material we may license to you, Apple does not claim ownership of the materials and/or Content you submit or make available on the Service. However, by submitting or posting such Content on areas of the Service that are accessible by the public, you grant Apple a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license to use, distribute, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, publicly perform and publicly display such Content on the Service solely for the purpose for which such Content was submitted or made available. Said license will terminate within a commercially reasonable time after you or Apple remove such Content from the public area. By submitting or posting such Content on areas of the Service that are accessible by the public, you are representing that you are the owner of such material and/or have authorization to distribute it."
 

Marcel

Happily retired
Staff member
Super Mod
You know something?

Google "Nikonites Red Flower Images".

13 images in the first 4 rows are MINE! Each image is "right clickable" at full resolution.

How can I post and keep my images mine?

I'd say reduce the definition. I post my pictures at 72 dpi and try to size them at either 800 or 1000 pixels. This way, they look ok on a monitor, but I don't think they'd be usable for publication. It's become part of my normal workflow. After I'm done with PP, I'll save as a photoshop file full definition, then resize with 72 dpi, then save in a "for nikonites" file. So, when time comes to upload, I always use the same file.
Hope this helps.
 

Browncoat

Senior Member
Creative Commons is a sham, largely perpetrated by mega corporations and promoted by social media (Flickr being the largest). It's not necessarily a rights grab per se, but a transfer of power from where it belongs (you) to someone else in the interest of "sharing". CC is crowdsourcing at its peak and does little besides take money and rights out of your hands and give it to someone else.

The bottom line here is, your stuff can be used by others for personal use. It's all considered fair use. Someone downloading your photo and using it on their blog or as a screensaver on their computer for example. The real issue here is commercial use: someone using your work for their own benefit (aka profit). CC licenses are irrevocable, meaning once you apply a CC license to one of your photos, it's there for life.

Creative Commons = bad.
 

Browncoat

Senior Member
Interesting on a couple different notes:

1. If this artwork is on public property, such as a city sidewalk, I would think that a good lawyer would be able to argue the point that it is in the public domain. This is probably why the judge was unable to interpret "fair use" and the issue had to be left up to a jury.

2. On the other hand, I have to congratulate the artist for not only suing the photographer, but the stock agency as well. It's about time someone put the screws to them instead of the other way around.
 

FarOut

New member
The main thing I do is watermark, sure it can be cropped out of its too small and if it's too big it can give your image a different feel but in the end it's worth it
 
Top