Since I tend to take many more pictures when traveling, I don't see the advantage for me to use RAW. I take a lot (600+) pictures during a cruise and to try and use RAW to post process that many photos seems overly done to me. I mean, I can't just set the software up to convert them all using the same white balance, etc. It would be more of a pain in the butt than I'm willing to take on. I might change my mind, but just considering all options.
This is why I shoot RAW + JPG.
I don't extensively post process every single shot I take, nor would I want too. Most of my shots look fine in JPG (after some adjustments to the in-camera menus for processing them). Every once in a while, though, I really nail a particular shot; one that *really* excites me. When that happens, I want the option of being able to work with that particular shot, or shots, and have the full flexibility working with a RAW file offers. The amount of adjustment a JPG allows for simply can't be compared to what you can do with a RAW file; there is, quite simply, no comparison.
The other thing this option provides for is the fact that sometimes a mediocre shot has an outstanding shot "hiding" within it. The addition of a Polarizing or Detail Enhancement filter in Nik Tools is sometimes all that's required to give an otherwise boring shot some significant Wow Factor.
As it has been said many, many times before... Both formats are tools for the photographer and both have their place.
...