What is the Digital Equivalent?

Lawrence

Senior Member
I have a Vivitar 200mm 1:3.5 lens which I can fit to my D5100 with an adaptor.

I know I will lose auto focus but if I go this route it is only till I can afford a decent new lens.

I was wondering if anyone could tell me what the equivalent is in today's modern lenses.

If I remember correctly I was a bit disappointed with this lens and would prefer something with a bit more magnification.

I hope that is not a stupid question.
 

pedroj

Senior Member
A lens to look at with zoom would be the 70-200mm F4 which is a very good lens...Not a cheap lens though

Nikon have a 200mm F4 lens Nikon 200mm F4 ED-IF that is supposed to be very good...Wont AF on the D5000 series lens..
 
Last edited:

Lawrence

Senior Member
Thanks guys. I was expecting those sort of prices and for the time being this will have to go on my bucket list.

Nickt what is the range of f stops for that Tamron of yours?
 

nickt

Senior Member
Maximum: f/4 - 5.6 Minimum: f/32 - 45
It changes as you zoom, that's why its given as a range. At 70mm it would be f4-f32, and as you zoom to 300 it would be f5.6-f45.
 

Lawrence

Senior Member
Maximum: f/4 - 5.6 Minimum: f/32 - 45
It changes as you zoom, that's why its given as a range. At 70mm it would be f4-f32, and as you zoom to 300 it would be f5.6-f45.

Thanks Nick. Sounds like a good lens and pretty quick too.

And that sounds like I suddenly know what I am talking about! :)
 

nickt

Senior Member
Thanks Nick. Sounds like a good lens and pretty quick too.

And that sounds like I suddenly know what I am talking about! :)
There are a few pictures of a heron and an egret in my gallery. All but one were taken with this lens. I'm still learning what it takes to get a good sharp picture.
 

Lawrence

Senior Member
Awesome I'll go and have a look. Were you far away from them? I hate the thought of buying a lens and then finding I need to leopard crawl an additional mile to get a decent shot … but on the other hand I don't have $10,000.00 for a lens either. :)
 

mikew_RIP

Senior Member
A good starting point keeping budget in mind may be the Nikon 55-300,yes the more expensive lenses should be better but this one is affordable

mike
 

nickt

Senior Member
Awesome I'll go and have a look. Were you far away from them? I hate the thought of buying a lens and then finding I need to leopard crawl an additional mile to get a decent shot … but on the other hand I don't have $10,000.00 for a lens either.
smile.png



No, not too far away. 300mm will get you closer than your 200, but it won't be leaps and bounds closer. I'm fortunate to have a lake pretty much in my back yard. Sooner or later they come pretty close to me.
 

Lawrence

Senior Member
Saw the photos and they are really good. I'd be happy with those. I am leaning towards the 55 - 300mm.
Only leaning though …not quite falling over yet
 

mikew_RIP

Senior Member
Not sure if any one has answered your original question,if you used the 200mm on 35mm then any thing with a 300mm end will more than double the apparent length due to the crop factor,thus a 55-300 will work like a 450mm did in the 35mm days.
This is only due to the sensor being smaller and doesn't really make the lens longer,as nick said you never seam to have a long enough lens anyway :D
 

Bob Blaylock

Senior Member
I have a Vivitar 200mm 1:3.5 lens which I can fit to my D5100 with an adaptor.

I know I will lose auto focus but if I go this route it is only till I can afford a decent new lens.

I was wondering if anyone could tell me what the equivalent is in today's modern lenses.

If I remember correctly I was a bit disappointed with this lens and would prefer something with a bit more magnification.

I hope that is not a stupid question.

I assume this is a lens that you previously used on a 35mm film camera?

If so, then know that because the sensor in your D5100 is smaller than a standard 35mm frame, you will get higher magnification with this lens on your D5100 than you got with it on a 35mm.

Every reference I have seen makes the factor between FX (full 35mm-sized frame) and DX (what you have in your D5100) to be 1.5, though my own math comes up with a number closer to 1.55. Going with the 1.5 factor, just because it produces easier numbers, your 200mm lens, mounted on your DX-format camera, will produce the same magnification that a 300mm lens would have produced on your old 35mm camera. If you found the magnification disappointing on a 35mm camera, you might find it's just right on your D5100.
 

Lawrence

Senior Member
I assume this is a lens that you previously used on a 35mm film camera? If so, then know that because the sensor in your D5100 is smaller than a standard 35mm frame, you will get higher magnification with this lens on your D5100 than you got with it on a 35mm. Every reference I have seen makes the factor between FX (full 35mm-sized frame) and DX (what you have in your D5100) to be 1.5, though my own math comes up with a number closer to 1.55. Going with the 1.5 factor, just because it produces easier numbers, your 200mm lens, mounted on your DX-format camera, will produce the same magnification that a 300mm lens would have produced on your old 35mm camera. If you found the magnification disappointing on a 35mm camera, you might find it's just right on your D5100.

​Now that is good news - thanks.
 

nickt

Senior Member
Sorry Lawrence, I misinterpreted your question to be "what modern lens could I replace this lens with?" I wasn't thinking crop factor. Like the others said, it will bring you closer.
 

Lawrence

Senior Member
Sorry Lawrence, I misinterpreted your question to be "what modern lens could I replace this lens with?" I wasn't thinking crop factor. Like the others said, it will bring you closer.

No Problem Nickt I appreciate both answers. Anyway I have pulled the trigger on a converter that will allow me to use my old lenses. NZ$59.00 (includes postage) seemed a cheap way to practice until I am ready to buy some good lenses.
 
Top