Stage Lighting

photoguy54

Senior Member
I take a lot of images of bands and musicians at a little club here. The stage is small and the lighting horrendous! As you can see, the red glow just wipes out everything else! The guy on the far left is out of that light. It's much worse than the pic actually shows due to some saturation editing. Short of pulling the light down and stomping on it, is there a way to help compensate for it in my setup? I also shoot mainly in jpeg format because I'm not yet familiar enough with raw to be comfortable with it. Would raw be easier to edit?

Thanks for your input!
​Jim

Dirty T Shirt Band_0031_edited-1.jpg

DateMay 17, 2013, 3:18:13 PM
Width3696
Height2448
File Size475222
CameraNIKON CORPORATION
ModelNIKON D5100
ISO3200
Exposure1/60 sec
Aperture4.0
Focal Length22mm
Flash Usedtrue
Orientation1
White Balance0
Metering Mode5
Exposure Program0
CCD Width23.6
Exposure Bias0.0
Date and Time (Original)2013:05:17 22:18:13
Color Space1
Bits Per Sample8
Photometric Interpretation2
Samples Per Pixel3
X-Resolution300.0
Y-Resolution300.0
Resolution Unit2
SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Elements 11.0 Windows
Date and Time2013:05:18 12:25:05
YCbCr Positioning2
Date and Time (Digitized)2013:05:17 22:18:13
Compressed Bits Per Pixel4.0
Max Aperture3.9
Light Source0
Sub Sec Time (Digitized)30
Sensing Method2
Custom Rendered0
Exposure Mode0
Digital Zoom Ratio1.0
Focal Length (in 35mm film)33
Scene Capture Type0
Gain Control2
Contrast0
Saturation0
Sharpness0
Subject Distance Range0
Interoperability IndexR98
Metadata Date2013-05-18T12:25:05-04:00
Image Number2552
Lens18.0-55.0 mm f/3.5-5.6
Lens ID154
Lens Information180/10 550/10 35/10 56/10
Serial Number3412883
Formatimage/jpeg
Time Zone Offset-4, -4
Time Zone Minutes0, 0
 

Rexer John

Senior Member
Raw would definately help because you don't have a set white balance.
You can take a single photo, then make 2, 3 or 4 images that have different white balance settings so each section of the photo has a correct white balance, then blend the images back into one photo with great white balance all over, using something like photoshop.

The down side to this technique is it will take quite a lot of time which is fine to get a great final image, but no good of you have hundreds you want to balance.

You would probably also lose the feel of the scene if you went too far from the actual lighting to get a clinical image.

The red doesn't bother me at all but the green is horrid.

Is the woman an audience member trying to get in on the pic? She looks 'armless anyway.
 

photoguy54

Senior Member
LOL! She's the tip collector for the Dirty T Shirt Band, Rexer John! :D I'm going to play with the raw format some for sure! I generally shoot 100-200 images, though...thus the reason for the jpeg format! Thanks for the tip!
 

Rexer John

Senior Member
Don't be intimidated by raw, it's just a file that you can adjust and then convert the output to jpeg.
If you don't like the jpeg output you can go back to the raw file (your digital negative) make adjustments and grab another jpeg.

Raw has so many advantages over jpeg and there are lots of posts on it around the forum.
The two biggest advantages in your scenario are that you can chose white balance after the shoot and you can bring out dark areas much better as there is so much more info in the file.
You can even change the exposure by up to plus or minus 2 stops, although limiting to 1 stop either way will give best results.

Shoot raw, not because it's cool or clever, but because it works!

Try shooting indoors at night with white balance set (incorrectly) to sunlight.
Try to correct the jpeg first, then try with the raw file.
​See how good raw is?
 
RAW is the way to go. You don't have to correct all the way to make it look better. Some color makes it look more like the club scene. Just tweak it a little to get it more pleasing. I spent an hour this afternoon teaching my wife to edit her own pictures instead to putting them in a folder and sending them over the network and telling me to "Fix" them. My advice to her was "less is more" little corrections look better than over cooking them.
 
Top