Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Bingo76" data-source="post: 824641" data-attributes="member: 53631">Hiya - thanks for this. Not that I'm a newbie, but had to google anti-aliasing (although I'd heard the expression before).<img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="😄" title="Grinning face with smiling eyes&nbsp; &nbsp; :smile:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/6.6/png/unicode/64/1f604.png" data-shortname=":smile:" />Am using the Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 G IF-ED VR. On this - a somewhat unrelated question. The D500 has an inbuilt focus motor/drive (apols if wrong term). I've actually an older AF Nikkor 70-300mm 1:4-5.6G lens that I was gifted as well - but I never used that on my D5000 as it was manual focus. I've played with it on the D500 and it auto-focuses super well - should I be using it? With the absence of VR, I'm just assuming the new lens is better?Will upload some pics later along with comments of what I hoped to see, vs what I did see.Thanks again for your input, much appreciated.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Bingo76, post: 824641, member: 53631"] Hiya - thanks for this. Not that I'm a newbie, but had to google anti-aliasing (although I'd heard the expression before).😄 Am using the Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 G IF-ED VR. On this - a somewhat unrelated question. The D500 has an inbuilt focus motor/drive (apols if wrong term). I've actually an older AF Nikkor 70-300mm 1:4-5.6G lens that I was gifted as well - but I never used that on my D5000 as it was manual focus. I've played with it on the D500 and it auto-focuses super well - should I be using it? With the absence of VR, I'm just assuming the new lens is better? Will upload some pics later along with comments of what I hoped to see, vs what I did see. Thanks again for your input, much appreciated. [/QUOTE]

Verification