Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
HDR
Quick question or two about HDR
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Clovishound" data-source="post: 846458" data-attributes="member: 50197"><p>This is an older thread, but it can be valuable to resurrect an old topic. Feel free to either post some of your results here in this thread, or start a new one of your own. Either way, we look forward to seeing some of your HDRs. I have used this technique a good bit at this location over the last few years, although I still find that sometimes I prefer to just edit one of the single exposures in the string. Still, it's a good tool to have in the box, and I have found it can make a difference in the final image. </p><p></p><p>Here's one I shot back in late Nov of last year. I don't remember if I tried a single exposure edit for this one or not. I suspect I did, but preferred the HDR version. I noticed that most of my edited shots of the sunrise taken that morning were HDRs. </p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]429974[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>I have found that I really like long exposure shots at this location. Here is one from a year and a half ago shot at 30 seconds, and I undoubtedly used my 10 stop ND filter, given the exposure data. Taking a bracketed string of long exposures would be rather cumbersome, and somewhat problematic, given the rapidly changing lighting at this time of day. Like HDRs, long exposures are a great technique, but not something you would, or should, use every day. </p><p> </p><p>[ATTACH=full]429977[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Clovishound, post: 846458, member: 50197"] This is an older thread, but it can be valuable to resurrect an old topic. Feel free to either post some of your results here in this thread, or start a new one of your own. Either way, we look forward to seeing some of your HDRs. I have used this technique a good bit at this location over the last few years, although I still find that sometimes I prefer to just edit one of the single exposures in the string. Still, it's a good tool to have in the box, and I have found it can make a difference in the final image. Here's one I shot back in late Nov of last year. I don't remember if I tried a single exposure edit for this one or not. I suspect I did, but preferred the HDR version. I noticed that most of my edited shots of the sunrise taken that morning were HDRs. [ATTACH type="full"]429974[/ATTACH] I have found that I really like long exposure shots at this location. Here is one from a year and a half ago shot at 30 seconds, and I undoubtedly used my 10 stop ND filter, given the exposure data. Taking a bracketed string of long exposures would be rather cumbersome, and somewhat problematic, given the rapidly changing lighting at this time of day. Like HDRs, long exposures are a great technique, but not something you would, or should, use every day. [ATTACH type="full"]429977[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
HDR
Quick question or two about HDR
Top