Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Low Light & Night
Post your low light long exposures
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="J-see" data-source="post: 404333" data-attributes="member: 31330"><p>I tested the information I read about ISO being a post-sensor process. It implies that no matter what the ISO setting, the sensor does not count more or less photons. That means that unless there is clipping, I should be able to grab as many stars using ISO 100 as I do at ISO 6400. All that ISO does is increase noise and saturated pixels.</p><p></p><p>I shot the 100 through 6400 range at 20 min and then processed those solely to check the differences in the sky. The higher the ISO, the more issues I had with the present pollution.</p><p></p><p>Here's the series:</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]133957[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]133958[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]133959[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]133960[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]133961[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]133962[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]133963[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>Even when some stars are brighter at higher ISO, that as easily can be accomplished by blending the same shot. All that ISO seems to add (for my cam) is noise and haze.</p><p></p><p>The best for my cam is to open up as wide as possible and shoot the longest shutter possible at ISO 100. The rest is best done in post since there the noise is not multiplied.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="J-see, post: 404333, member: 31330"] I tested the information I read about ISO being a post-sensor process. It implies that no matter what the ISO setting, the sensor does not count more or less photons. That means that unless there is clipping, I should be able to grab as many stars using ISO 100 as I do at ISO 6400. All that ISO does is increase noise and saturated pixels. I shot the 100 through 6400 range at 20 min and then processed those solely to check the differences in the sky. The higher the ISO, the more issues I had with the present pollution. Here's the series: [ATTACH=CONFIG]133957._xfImport[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]133958._xfImport[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]133959._xfImport[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]133960._xfImport[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]133961._xfImport[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]133962._xfImport[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]133963._xfImport[/ATTACH] Even when some stars are brighter at higher ISO, that as easily can be accomplished by blending the same shot. All that ISO seems to add (for my cam) is noise and haze. The best for my cam is to open up as wide as possible and shoot the longest shutter possible at ISO 100. The rest is best done in post since there the noise is not multiplied. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Low Light & Night
Post your low light long exposures
Top