Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Low Light & Night
Post your low light long exposures
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="J-see" data-source="post: 402361" data-attributes="member: 31330"><p>Here's the same shot at ISO 3200 which is five stops overexposed compared to the other. I've always been shooting high ISO when doing stars convinced it was required to get enough light in and thus detail but apparently it makes little difference. Yes there are more stars but maybe at 200 or 400 ISO I grab those too.</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]133071[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>And both blended together using multiple versions of both.</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]133079[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="J-see, post: 402361, member: 31330"] Here's the same shot at ISO 3200 which is five stops overexposed compared to the other. I've always been shooting high ISO when doing stars convinced it was required to get enough light in and thus detail but apparently it makes little difference. Yes there are more stars but maybe at 200 or 400 ISO I grab those too. [ATTACH=CONFIG]133071._xfImport[/ATTACH] And both blended together using multiple versions of both. [ATTACH=CONFIG]133079._xfImport[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Low Light & Night
Post your low light long exposures
Top
