I have to say that I find the first photo more interesting, although there is something to be said for both.Need a little help selecting one of these to make into a 36x16 canvas print as a gift.
This is the Okotoks Erratic aka "The Big Rock". It is a out of place big rock deposited by the glaciers eons ago.
This one is a stitch of eight images.
Shot with my D610 and a Tamron 20-40 2.7-3.5 (yes 2.7 how odd is that one)
Shot at 40mm and F11, 1/500 and ISO 280 - from the EXIF data.
View attachment 235489
Lots of sky - shows how 'erratic' the Okotoks Erratic is.
Then this shot - also the D610 but with a slightly newer version of Tamrons' ultra wide zoom the 17-35 2.8-4.
Shot at F5 (I know now I should have gone with a much higher F stop for landscapes but this worked).
Shot at 24mm, 1/800 and ISO 400
This shot shows the bigness of the Big Rock better and I like the morning light on the rock - I like rock shape in this view better.
But the sky is so bland - I suppose it does not distract from the main subject, but blah blue.
View attachment 235490
And any advice about getting larger prints made. Never had a print made up this large.
Found a shop in Calgary AB ( http://www.artsense.ca) that prints to canvas and mounts it. About $150 CDN.
My wife has a canvas print and she likes the look.
Need a little help selecting one of these to make into a 36x16 canvas print as a gift.
This is the Okotoks Erratic aka "The Big Rock". It is a out of place big rock deposited by the glaciers eons ago.
This one is a stitch of eight images.
Shot with my D610 and a Tamron 20-40 2.7-3.5 (yes 2.7 how odd is that one)
Shot at 40mm and F11, 1/500 and ISO 280 - from the EXIF data.
Lots of sky - shows how 'erratic' the Okotoks Erratic is.
Then this shot - also the D610 but with a slightly newer version of Tamrons' ultra wide zoom the 17-35 2.8-4.
Shot at F5 (I know now I should have gone with a much higher F stop for landscapes but this worked).
Shot at 24mm, 1/800 and ISO 400
This shot shows the bigness of the Big Rock better and I like the morning light on the rock - I like rock shape in this view better.
But the sky is so bland - I suppose it does not distract from the main subject, but blah blue.
Why not put the sky on the first one behind the rock on the second ?
Just an idea.
Both great shots.
I'll see what Misters Google and Youtube show me about how to do this seamlessly.
I hear sky swapping can be done in a way that blends well. ....
Another skill to be learned.
Need a little help selecting one of these to make into a 36x16 canvas print as a gift.
This is the Okotoks Erratic aka "The Big Rock". It is a out of place big rock deposited by the glaciers eons ago.
This one is a stitch of eight images.
Shot with my D610 and a Tamron 20-40 2.7-3.5 (yes 2.7 how odd is that one)
Shot at 40mm and F11, 1/500 and ISO 280 - from the EXIF data.
View attachment 235489
Lots of sky - shows how 'erratic' the Okotoks Erratic is.
Then this shot - also the D610 but with a slightly newer version of Tamrons' ultra wide zoom the 17-35 2.8-4.
Shot at F5 (I know now I should have gone with a much higher F stop for landscapes but this worked).
Shot at 24mm, 1/800 and ISO 400
This shot shows the bigness of the Big Rock better and I like the morning light on the rock - I like rock shape in this view better.
But the sky is so bland - I suppose it does not distract from the main subject, but blah blue.
View attachment 235490
And any advice about getting larger prints made. Never had a print made up this large.
Found a shop in Calgary AB ( http://www.artsense.ca) that prints to canvas and mounts it. About $150 CDN.
My wife has a canvas print and she likes the look.
i like the first shot, the fence to me is a distraction (first thing i looked at not the subject rock) but it does give scale.need a little help selecting one of these to make into a 36x16 canvas print as a gift.
This is the okotoks erratic aka "the big rock". It is a out of place big rock deposited by the glaciers eons ago.
This one is a stitch of eight images.
Shot with my d610 and a tamron 20-40 2.7-3.5 (yes 2.7 how odd is that one)
shot at 40mm and f11, 1/500 and iso 280 - from the exif data.
View attachment 235489
lots of sky - shows how 'erratic' the okotoks erratic is.
Then this shot - also the d610 but with a slightly newer version of tamrons' ultra wide zoom the 17-35 2.8-4.
Shot at f5 (i know now i should have gone with a much higher f stop for landscapes but this worked).
Shot at 24mm, 1/800 and iso 400
this shot shows the bigness of the big rock better and i like the morning light on the rock - i like rock shape in this view better.
But the sky is so bland - i suppose it does not distract from the main subject, but blah blue.
View attachment 235490
and any advice about getting larger prints made. Never had a print made up this large.
Found a shop in calgary ab ( http://www.artsense.ca) that prints to canvas and mounts it. About $150 cdn.
My wife has a canvas print and she likes the look.