Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Portrait
Pets/"Petography" Thread!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="J-see" data-source="post: 374945" data-attributes="member: 31330"><p>I'm a pixel peeper myself. It's hard to not see the weakness and strength of a cam when you're manually adjusting the shot at 100%. I've thrown out maybe 70% of my bird shots today. They looked great until I cropped and was confronted with the 100% reality. Higher than ISO 400, the D3300 really suffered in the darker areas. That much there was too much detail lost. I just looked at a 10k ISO shot of the D750 and it had as much noise in the dark areas as my 3300 at 800. In the lighter areas it hardly suffered.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="J-see, post: 374945, member: 31330"] I'm a pixel peeper myself. It's hard to not see the weakness and strength of a cam when you're manually adjusting the shot at 100%. I've thrown out maybe 70% of my bird shots today. They looked great until I cropped and was confronted with the 100% reality. Higher than ISO 400, the D3300 really suffered in the darker areas. That much there was too much detail lost. I just looked at a 10k ISO shot of the D750 and it had as much noise in the dark areas as my 3300 at 800. In the lighter areas it hardly suffered. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Portrait
Pets/"Petography" Thread!
Top
