Peek-A-Boo

pforsell

Senior Member
A portrait of my brother.

5975562228_f0b82af7a5_m.jpg



Larger version here:
_P7F2046_250711 | Flickr - Photo Sharing!


Critique and comments welcome.

D3x | AF 85/1.4D | f/4
 

JoeLewisPhotography

Senior Member
Yikes. I have to be honest. I don't like this one at all. Based on the title, I see what you were going for...but it just doesn't work (unless you were going for something else and settled for this).... You should never cut off limbs, fingers, tops of heads and most importantly, half of their face.

Now...if "peek-a-boo" is what you were going for, having him "peek" around/over an object or something would have been much better. Fill the frame with something. Peeking over the bottom of the photo leaves little to be desired. there is too much "nothing" in the rest of the frame. Sorry...hope that didn't come off harsh...it was not meant to be. On a positive note...he is sharp from what I can see. lol.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have to agree with Joe Lewis. When I look at your shot, it reminds me of "Tool Time" - with the neighbor (Wilson) looking over the fence, or the "Kilroy" image. Perhaps if it was done peeking over a fence with the nose, eyes and forehead, with the fingers curled over the top of the fence - would have given a point of reference.
 

fotojack

Senior Member
Yup, I have to agree with the above posts. It just doesn't do it for me. It looks like ya missed the shot altogether, or he moved just as you were taking the shot. :)
 

ohkphoto

Snow White
Peter, what was your intent with this shot? While I personally don't find it visually appealing, I do find it interesting. I'm also curious as to what your brother thought of it. . . .unfortunately I'm also a busybody :cool:
 

Browncoat

Senior Member
I have to admit that I've been struggling with this one all day. It's extremely rare that I'm caught at a complete loss for words, but that seems to be the case here. I can't decide if this is brilliant or just downright awful. The composition here breaks just about every rule of photography, but I happen to like artists who aren't afraid to fly their middle finger once in awhile.

This photo is like a train wreck: It's horrific, but I just can't look away. I know I shouldn't like it, but I do. I want to know more. I'm intrigued and confused.

Congratulations with this photo, sir. You have managed to evoke emotion from everyone who has responded to your post, and that should be applauded. Even the negative reactions here are strong, and that's a good thing.
 

pforsell

Senior Member
Thank you everybody for your honest opinions.

Some background for the photo. First of all, he's my bro. He has endured my first flailing photography steps back in the 1980's, posed for me sitting, standing, jumping, running, falling, swimming, sleeping and whatnot. Studio lights, available light, on-location light, reflectors, flashlights, bonfires, lasers, moonlight, car headlights... you name it. I have a lot of pictures of him. I have all the usual images, a hundred of each, and a few hundred not so usual.

I've shot more formal portraits and informal ones than I care to remember of more people than I can remember. I'm past that. At the moment I want something else: candid street, abstract, miksang, minimalistic, conceptual, non-documentary and sometimes just pure visual with no attached story. Often extra contrasty grungy black and white. I shoot images that convey an emotion to me, but not necessarily to others. That's why I openly ask critique here, to get response and hear the thoughts of other photographers. Yet I know that a fellow photographer is not always the best critic, because we tend look at an image in the same way, which is a completely different way than a "normal" person does it. Okay, enough of soul searching now.

I had this image cooking in my head for a while now. Unconventional composition and unexpected framing (like Anthony put it, train wreck effect). I am a big fan of negative space, and in this image it perfectly balances the "weight" of his face in the corner, imho.

Thank you all. I respect every comment and I understand both the negative ones and the positive ones and thank you warmly for them.
 
Last edited:

Browncoat

Senior Member
Honestly, I had a feeling your response would be along these lines. I remembered looking at your Fotoblur gallery when you first joined here. There is some impressive work in that gallery, and there are a few conceptual shots there as well. In particular, this one, Batwoman, and especially Wormhole in Canada.

You're not afraid to push boundaries or question the norms, and in my opinion at least, that is what truly lies at the center of the creative mind.
 
Last edited:

ohkphoto

Snow White
At the moment I want something else: candid street, abstract, miksang, minimalistic, conceptual, non-documentary and sometimes just pure visual with no attached story. Often extra contrasty grungy black and white. I shoot images that convey an emotion to me, but not necessarily to others.
Thank you for sharing this, Peter. I understand this because I think I'm there, too. . . searching for a way to express that voice inside. That's one of the reasons I didn't dismiss your photo.

I'm with Anthony on this . . . he posted some nice examples of your work. Thank you for sharing your 'quest' and I look forward to more.
 
Top