Nikon 200mm f/2

robbins.photo

Senior Member
so i need to get out of M (Moron) mode? that's why i suck then.
Wait, the M is for moron? I thought it stood for mariachi.

Ok, well that does explain a lot actually. At that last event when they saw my sombrero... See I was thinking they just didn't get it.

Huh...

Sent from my N9518 using Tapatalk
 

snpr9696

Senior Member
Yes, it is a terrific lens for the price (even at $400) plus it is nowhere near the weight of the 200m f/2.

I'm sure the 180mm is a great lens for what it is but it can hardly be compared to the 200mm f/2. Sorry.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

hark

Administrator
Staff member
Super Mod
I'm sure the 180mm is a great lens for what it is but it can hardly be compared to the 200mm f/2. Sorry.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No one is saying that.

I was simply confirming what a couple of others said. Of course it isn't the same lens and isn't in the same category; however, for a lot less money, it is a fast, much lighter weight prime with gorgeous bokeh.
 

Samo

Senior Member
The accountant says no profit get an 18-200 instead. 104 weddings this year. 2K jpegs per event. Chop chop! LOL
 

salukfan111

Senior Member
Now I'm curious... Are the initials of the photographer you speak of B.K. by any chance?

I don't dare use his full name for fear of inciting a flame-war.
...
I'm not sure without looking. He takes nice magazine covers and doesn't seem controversial. Maybe he likes small lens?

It is, forgot I typed it. The guys doesn't use any id on his gear.
 
Last edited:
Top