Nikkor 24mm 2.8 AF-D compared to newer Nikkor 28mm 1.8g

[D12345678]

Yes I am happy with my decision..Could not have done this shot without my 28mm..

Fantastic shot!

 

[ShootRaw]

Pulled out the 28mm today at the park....This was @ 2.8
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/116582524@N05/12397395963/] [/URL]

 

[bigal1000]

The old 24mm has a good amount of distortion. The 28mm is a beaut

Distortion can be removed easily with Lightroom or any good editing software !

 

[baileyworks]

Just joined and just switched from canon to Nikon. I had to buy all new lenses when I switched, so I kind of went through this whole thing recently. My 2 cents worth takes a different track, while I would agree the 28 is optically superior to the 24, I went with the 24: one because I bought 20, 24, 35, 50 and 85 primes and two because in my mind, there is a huge difference between a 24 and 28 in how the image looks. The 28 is just not wide enough, nor a big enough jump from the 35. And yes, at times I think I probably should have just gotten a zoom to cover it all. But that 24 is sharp as hell with my 610. So, I guess it just comes down to a bunch of opinions, yes?

 

[ShootRaw]

Im rockin the Nikkor 24mm-70mm 2.8 now...Glad I sold the 28mm 1.8g..It had focus shift problems...

 

[gqtuazon]

yes. combining all of those D prime lenses makes the 24-70mm f2.8g a better bargain and lighter.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk