Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Woodyg3" data-source="post: 805296" data-attributes="member: 24569">The latest version of Lightroom Classic has a new noise reduction feature built in that is AI based. It's right in the detail panel. It creates a new DNG RAW file. It is a simpler set up than Topaz DeNoise, and takes less time than going to an external plug in each time you use it. I have played around with it a bit and the results are very impressive. I compared to results with Topaz and the only thing I can say for sure is that it will take a lot of processing before I come to any conclusions about which I prefer. Viewed at normal size, there is little difference in the files and both do a great job.If you want to see a video that shows comparisons:[MEDIA=youtube]ITPg_wTTaww[/MEDIA]I think the guy is a tad Adobe biased, but it is an interesting comparison.Any and all comments from everyone as you've had a chance to try out the new feature will be helpful and appreciated to all of us post processing obsessed folks. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />Humorous side note, Autocorrect REALLY wanted to change denoise to Denise.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Woodyg3, post: 805296, member: 24569"] The latest version of Lightroom Classic has a new noise reduction feature built in that is AI based. It's right in the detail panel. It creates a new DNG RAW file. It is a simpler set up than Topaz DeNoise, and takes less time than going to an external plug in each time you use it. I have played around with it a bit and the results are very impressive. I compared to results with Topaz and the only thing I can say for sure is that it will take a lot of processing before I come to any conclusions about which I prefer. Viewed at normal size, there is little difference in the files and both do a great job. If you want to see a video that shows comparisons: [MEDIA=youtube]ITPg_wTTaww[/MEDIA] I think the guy is a tad Adobe biased, but it is an interesting comparison. Any and all comments from everyone as you've had a chance to try out the new feature will be helpful and appreciated to all of us post processing obsessed folks. :) Humorous side note, Autocorrect REALLY wanted to change denoise to Denise. [/QUOTE]

Verification