Hi,
I switched to mirroless nearly 3 years ago.
I had a Canon 5D MKII. In June 2012 the Olympus OM-D E-M5 came on the market.
I was overwhelmed by its looks and its performance. And of course it weight and size...
But in the years I missed quite a few very nice photos, using the E-M5.
Alltough the AF was very fast, its accuracy wasn't good enough.
I bought its successor, the E-M1. But even this didn't do it.
A full day visiting the Photokina Cologne, trying a lot of different camera's, didn't make me smile.
The months after, I tried several very good camera's.
The E-M1, which I had...
The sony A7, A7R and later the A7II. The Fuji XT1, several times. The Panasonic GH4.
All very good, quite to very fast... but all, not the accurasy of a DLSR, certainly not at a long tele end.
As you all now, in that time the new Nikon, the D750, was presented.
I tried him once... saw his ISO capabilities (it's a beast!!)... and I knew it, despite its weight and size, THIS IS IT!!(for me...)
Maybe a few mirrorless camera's are faster, but deu to its accurasy, with the D750 I could take every picture I want to take.
The making of this choice kept me busy for 6 months!
I have the D750 for 1,5 month now, together with the 24-120 f4 VR and 70-200 f4 VR lenses.
Also a Kenko 1.4 PRO 300 extender, which works with both lenses. I probably want to buy the Tamron 150-600, later this year.
Now I take and can take every picture I want to take.
I conclude: mirrorless isn't the replacement for a DLSR for me. Maybe in several years...
It needs more development, to make it as accurate as a DLSR. That's the main point for me.
...and if we could take that high ISO pictures as with the D750, convince in that time, maybe I'll sell the D750. But for now, absolutely NO!
Ad B