I shot RAW -JPEG-Fine

Horoscope Fish

Senior Member
I've been through the whole JPG to JPG + RAW to just shooting all RAW, all the time as well and I know a big part of moving away from shooting JPG for me was a difference in mindset. Whether I realized it or not at the time, when I shot JPG, there was an underlying assumption I was going to be keeping every shot. Then, at some point, I realized I if I got home from a cool shoot having taken 100 shots, I'd be really happy if I found fifteen or twenty that were really good shots. If I then could find three or four shots, out of those fifteen or twenty really good ones, that I was totally happy with I'd be very excited.

But numbers aside I think the important thing is the underlying concept... Out of 100 shots I only plan on working with maaaybe twenty of them and those I do deem worthy of working on I want to be able to REALLY WORK ON to the fullest possible extent because I've already pared things down to those shots that are really, seriously rockin' my *boxers; and that means shooting in RAW. Invest in some decent processing software and book a or two on how to use it and you'll never go back to shooting JPG; not once you get a taste of the control you have when working with a RAW file. The important thing, though, is the mindset and how it differs from when I was shooting JPG and holding on to pretty much every, even remotely-decent shot I took. Shoot RAW, keep fewer shots, but get the most out of them.

One of these days I'm going to get up the gumption to go through hundreds of folders of old JPG's and just cull the drive, en masse, because the old mindset had me holding on to way, waaay too much crappy photography.












*Actually a brief's sorta guy (50/50 Cotton/Poly, Solid Colors).
 
Last edited:

Michael J.

Senior Member
The other day I shot and I didn't care about anything - The photo was not that sharp and blue as well. But I shot RAW and so I thought if it is really so easy to change the WB in LR.

Here is the result - Just customized the WB and resized the photos. Nothing other PP done.

Out of Cam -RAW

wbdefau.jpg




after just corrected the WB


wbcorec.jpg


Still not great or nearly good photos - just to demonstrate how RAW is helping you if something goes wrong with your settings.
 

Mike D90

Senior Member
Just a thought here but I believe shooting RAW would ultimately make the best image when converted to a JPEG than an image shot originally in JPEG and then post processed to its best quality. If the image information is not there it cannot be put there after the shutter has been released. If the maximum of info is already there it can be retained for better results.

I see no reason to shoot in JPEG unless its just for space storage reasons or if one has no software to process RAW.
 

Michael J.

Senior Member
Just to show you, cos my neighbor came to me and asked me what I shoot. I said Raw. He is using JPEG. I did some shoots. He is sitting next to me while I write this. He was amazed how I could within 3 minures change a photo to something we both saw.

I shot JPEG-Fine and RAW

This was the JPEG capture with a bit PP in LR

morningj-1.jpg


and this was the RAW shot with LR PP as well. It turns out what we saw

morningr-1.jpg


This was the final he liked

morningr1-1.jpg


Now I have to teach him LR. *LOL*
 

Michael J.

Senior Member
Yesterday morning I set the camera to RAW and JPEG fine just for a test again.

SOOC just resized (JPEG)

jpg-test-2.jp.jpg



after i used this JPEG File LR to manipulate a bit to get the situation I saw

jpg-test-1.jp.jpg




But the RAW gave me satisfaction

morning-5-4-2015-ype-banbung-3.jpg
 
Top