Horoscope Fish :: Fishbowl-O-Rama :: 365 for 2015 ::

Bill16

Senior Member
I've been thinking about this and your doing it on your new D750 make you a great one to ask my friend! My D800e still has a OLPF though it is supposed to be overcome so as to be as if it wasn't there. But after watching a video a while back I wonder if removing the OLPF altogether would improve it even more? Or would the bypass that it has in it cause a problem itself without the OLPF there for it to work against?
Also d you think the improvement if any would be worth the cost to have it done?I love my D800e and I plan to keep it for a long time to come, with it having only just over 8,000 actuations on it! :)

So what would you recommend buddy?

In doing my research there was a lot of back and forth I read on this topic. Many felt 24 mega-pixels is not a sufficient pixel-density (on a full-frame sensor) to make removing the OLPF worth while; that doing so would not improve sharpness. On cameras like the D800, with half-again as many pixels on the same surface area as the D750, it makes perfect sense to remove the OLPF and that's why we have the D800e, for example. To extend the logic, this is why some of the newer crop-sensor bodies (e.g. the D7200, D7100, D5300 and D3300) with the same number of MP do not have an OLPF either; the sensors overall pixel-density is increased with the same number of MP, obviously, because of its smaller physical dimensions. While that argument looked good on paper, it wasn't quite jiving in my mind.

The most logical conclusion for including the OLPF on the D750 I could come up with is two-fold and pieced together from other people's deeper insight. Primarily I'm convinced the D750 was meant to have as wide a market appeal as possible; and I mean *really* wide. If Master at None the D750 is a classic Jack-of-all-Trades in my estimation. In support of that idea I think Nikon wanted the D750 to be a camera worthy of serious consideration for those who shoot video as well as "still" photography. And when you consider how much bigger a concern moiré is for videographers it starts to make real sense (at least in my own mind). So, in short, that is the conclusion I came to from reading a lot of technical "back and forth" from several sources that, too be perfectly honest, I did not always fully understand.

In mulling over whether or not I wanted to have the OLPF pulled out of my camera I rationalized two possible outcomes: a significant improvement or very little improvement. So while it was a gamble of sorts, the risk seemed relatively low and the potential gain seemed relatively high. Had I over-thought things I probably would have paralyzed myself with indecision and done nothing.

As it turns out having OLPF removed has breathed new life into my camera; images are definitely cleaner and sharper by good margin and I'm very happy with my decision.

....
 

Horoscope Fish

Senior Member
I've been thinking about this and your doing it on your new D750 make you a great one to ask my friend! My D800e still has a OLPF though it is supposed to be overcome so as to be as if it wasn't there. But after watching a video a while back I wonder if removing the OLPF altogether would improve it even more? Or would the bypass that it has in it cause a problem itself without the OLPF there for it to work against?
Also d you think the improvement if any would be worth the cost to have it done?I love my D800e and I plan to keep it for a long time to come, with it having only just over 8,000 actuations on it! :)

So what would you recommend buddy?
In all honesty that's a very technical question I don't feel qualified to answer. As I understand it, the D800e is unique in that it HAS an OLPF installed but also has an additional layer of optical glass that is supposed to eliminate the effects of the OLPF, so I'm not sure if you'd see a significant improvement in sharpness or not by having the filter removed.

If you're seriously considering having this done my advice would be to contact to Daniel at Life Pixel and get his input on the matter before proceeding; this is definitely a question for the experts.
....
 

Bill16

Senior Member
Thank you buddy! I was thinking it wouldn't likely improve it enough, especially since it would likely cost even more to remove the OLPF and the layer you mentioned.
I just thought I'd ask buddy in case you had a different thought I hadn't considered! :)

I appreciate your help my friend! :D

In all honesty that's a very technical question I don't feel qualified to answer. As I understand it, the D800e is unique in that it HAS an OLPF installed but also has an additional layer of optical glass that is supposed to eliminate the effects of the OLPF, so I'm not sure if you'd see a significant improvement in sharpness or not by having the filter removed.

If you're seriously considering having this done my advice would be to contact to Daniel at Life Pixel and get his input on the matter before proceeding; this is definitely a question for the experts.
....
 

Horoscope Fish

Senior Member
18 May 2015 / Day 138 of 365
.....
....
Soooo Phoning it in Today.jpg
Bel-Air Mail​
....
....
 
Last edited:

Horoscope Fish

Senior Member
nice, i wonder if it pays the bills any faster?
If not faster, at least with a touch of class, eh?

And you know, I drive by that mailbox on a fairly regular basis and it *always* looks to be in absolutely pristine condition like you see it in my shot: no dust, not even a water spot. Odd as it might sound, I'm convinced someone is showing that mailbox some serious love.
....
 

Horoscope Fish

Senior Member
Okay I'm not sure how this happened but I'm freaking PO'ed right now!

In looking at the EXIF data, starting on May 11th with "Your Crackers... Bring Them to Me", my D750's date/time calendar got off beat and started dating my photos for January 2016. I have several shots with bad EXIF data because I just now noticed this as I came to post a couple shots from the weekend.

I've corrected things in-camera, but it I feel like I've screwed the pooch on my 365 what without EXIF to verify my shots. I'm wondering if this happened when I had my D750 sent out to Life Pixel to have the OLPF removed?! Well, anyway, I should have caught it but didn't. I'm going to press on with my 365 and just see where the chips fall...

....
 

cwgrizz

Senior Member
Challenge Team
Paul, I had just noticed the Exif date was in 2016......... but after advancing to the next page, I see you have too. I hate it when I go into the future. I have enough problems dealing with the past, let alone the future. Ha!
 

Moab Man

Senior Member
Unless you have a Delorean I don't think anyone I'd going to believe you went back to the future to bring photographs to the here and now. However, if you did, who wins the world series?
 

Roy1961

Senior Member
Contributor
Unless you have a Delorean I don't think anyone I'd going to believe you went back to the future to bring photographs to the here and now. However, if you did, who wins the world series?

never mind the world series, whats next weeks lotto numbers

Paul if its was me i would believe you
 
Top