Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Computers and Software
Help: Inconsistent color & contrast
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Horoscope Fish" data-source="post: 514003" data-attributes="member: 13090"><p>This, meaning the bolded part, I think, is the key... </p><p></p><p>I say this because your aRGB image looks precisely how I would <em>expect</em> an aRGB image to look if it had not yet been processed. I can't tell you why it is that they do, but aRGB files have always looked flatter and duller to me out of the camera than sRGB files. Both colorspaces work up with equal ease in post-processing and I usually convert my aRGB files to sRGB as part of the workflow for final output, but I'm starting to wonder if you're not seeing your aRGB images CORRECTLY only now and thinking there's a problem when in reality, the problem has been there all along and you're just now able to see it. Having not been in the drivers seat all along as you have it's hard to say, but in short, I'm starting to think don't have a problem at all. </p><p></p><p>One file, with an aRGB colorspace, looks dull and flat, just like I would expect. The other file, with an sRGB colorspace, has more contrast and saturation, just like I would expect. Why you haven't seen things this way before I don't know and I'm not sure anyone here will be able to explain it, assuming I'm correct.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Horoscope Fish, post: 514003, member: 13090"] This, meaning the bolded part, I think, is the key... I say this because your aRGB image looks precisely how I would [I]expect[/I] an aRGB image to look if it had not yet been processed. I can't tell you why it is that they do, but aRGB files have always looked flatter and duller to me out of the camera than sRGB files. Both colorspaces work up with equal ease in post-processing and I usually convert my aRGB files to sRGB as part of the workflow for final output, but I'm starting to wonder if you're not seeing your aRGB images CORRECTLY only now and thinking there's a problem when in reality, the problem has been there all along and you're just now able to see it. Having not been in the drivers seat all along as you have it's hard to say, but in short, I'm starting to think don't have a problem at all. One file, with an aRGB colorspace, looks dull and flat, just like I would expect. The other file, with an sRGB colorspace, has more contrast and saturation, just like I would expect. Why you haven't seen things this way before I don't know and I'm not sure anyone here will be able to explain it, assuming I'm correct. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Computers and Software
Help: Inconsistent color & contrast
Top