BackdoorArts
Senior Member
I thought he was still talking Tokina.
I've been pondering this all morning. I am so on the fence, only because the new Nikon coming out only covers 1/2 the gap between my 24-85 and the 14-24. This photo is what has me most bothered...
![]()
Getting to 16mm gives me about 50% more coverage than at 18mm, and 14mm would be even better, but I could live without it at that cost. The 18 allows me to use filters, but the Tamron gives me reach and a nice fixed 2.8 for only $100 more.
Again, arrgh!! I may just roll the dice.
Yeah c'mon aZuMi, where's the pics!!
Yup, that's what I thought as well. Although I already don't mind the 2.8 since I like the use of shallow DOF on my shots anyways and center is very sharp already at 2.8.Thanks. Looks pretty sharp all over by 5.6.