Search results

The two images were shot at different times (days). The settings were also different: iso and aperture. Thus noise factors may set in. But that isn't so considered in the debate. The presentation of these images was first aimed to show the new lens - z 180-600 - can be as good as or better than...

I think you are right in the same way as BF indicated (and I observed). However, IMO, if the focus points are on the eye, they get the same (or at least) sharpness there.

My observation too.

These two images are not mine, but there was a serious critical debate about the photo gear used to produce them. In order to not bring in your personal biased (or intentional) opinion, none of the details is revealed. Just compare the images and opine on their sharpness and IQ: one is better or...

Nice shots! But no Exif?

Will you eat them? lol

Congratulations to Peter!!!

I sold my FTZii to them at a very good price and fast.

@SPV Your shots are fine if not perfect. Look forward to seeing more of the S.F. skyline, streets, landscape, ocean scape, day or night, and so on from you. This one from my 2022 trip:

So the first and third images are from different shots?

Welcome Northern California neighbor and friend!

Why do I see some car image at the left bottom corner of Clovis' edited version which is not there in SPV's original post?

Maybe testing his (kind of sophisticated) photography gear?

Like the colors.

Thanks for everyone's input. It looks like a valuable item with a too-high price tag. I was just wandering in some used market to get an idea of a "deal breaker and hidden catch".

Sorry, it's bcgforums' marketplace thread. Here are some screenshots: