Korot,
I am not certain - is my answer
One thing that " could " help, does the web site have a "long side" pixel dimension to shot for?
Here we like the long side to be 1000 ( I use 1024 when posting here).
One thing for sure - during export is the easiest place to change things in NX studio
Sorry for not knowing this one - Bill
Np Bill. I did some research as follows which may be helpful in some way for those doing mental loops trying to figure all this out, like me.
This is my thinking on monitor resolution ..
My MacBook Air M1 has a monitor aspect of 16:10
The monitor px: 2560 x 1600
An image of 2560px width with an aspect ratio of 16:9 would show a height of 1440px = 160px less height.
My understanding is that Apple designed the aspect ratio to be 16:10 because of the design of the newer monitors with a reduced bezel size. So at 1440px the top 160px would not be hidden by the new ‘Notch’ since the camera which used to be in the bezel.
My PC monitor has an aspect ratio of 16:9
The monitor px: 1920 x 1080
An image of 1920px width with an aspect ratio of 16:9 would show a height of 1080px = the full height of the monitor.
My iPhone has a screen size of 2778 x 1284
With the landscape orientation, 1920px width with an aspect ratio image 16:9 would make the height 1080px allowing 204px for the ‘Notch’ and controls at both sides.
So an image aspect ratio of 16:9 works all round.
This is my thinking on image resolution ..
Taking the image resolution of 300ppi vs 600ppi:
The Mac monitor resolution is a width of 2560px @ 227ppi = 2560/227 = 11.27 inches full width.
So at 300ppi the image would show as 2560/300 = 8.53 inches which is around 75% of the Mac monitor width.
At 600ppi the image would show as 2560/600 = 4.25 inches or 37.5%.
Likewise, the PC monitor at 1920px @ 102ppi = 1920/102 = 18.8 inches full width.
So at 300ppi the image would show as 1920/300 = 6.40 inches which is around 34% of the PC monitor width.
At 600ppi the image would show as 1920/600 = 3.20 inches or 17%.
The iPhone monitor landscape resolution is a width of 2778px @ 458ppi = 2778/458 = 6.06 inches full width.
So at 300ppi the image would show as 2778/300 = 9.26 inches which is around 1.6 times the iPhone monitor size (so it would no doubt be automatically scaled down to the max width of the device).
At 600ppi the image would show as 2778/600 = 4.63 or 80%.
Having said all that, the application may force 72ppi
I’m not sure if this helps. But if I or someone can help show how this math answers my question I’ll be delirious
So I’m going to test and cry till I get the best choice of image ppi that allows good zoom for great detail.