D750 vs X-T1

E

Eyelight

Senior Member
J-see said:
When I'm driving in a Fiat Uno next to a Ferrari on the highway and we're both going 60mph, I could say; "Look, there's no difference between both!"
Click to expand...

In some respects and functions, there is no difference. In others there are big differences. More useful is, they are different tools used for different tasks.

If I had both, I would drive the Fiat (actually wouldn't, but for the sake of this post) sell the Ferrari and buy a few good lenses.

:very_drunk:
 
J

J-see

Senior Member
Eyelight said:
In some respects and functions, there is no difference. In others there are big differences. More useful is, they are different tools used for different tasks.

If I had both, I would drive the Fiat (actually wouldn't, but for the sake of this post) sell the Ferrari and buy a few good lenses.

:very_drunk:
Click to expand...

That's the point; you can't take two different things, find a similarity and declare them equal based on that.

I started with the D3300 and the thing was amazing. Why would I need an FX is what I said; too much money for too little difference. That was during the summer. By the time it closed in at winter and the light got low, I got very tired of losing my shots to noise. I changed my mind and got an FX.

That's when I learned the reason why FX costs more than DX and why it is worth that money.
 
Marcel

Marcel

Happily retired
Staff member
Super Mod
One thing you must not forget is that the original poster AC016 only asked if we could guess which picture was made with which camera. There was never any mention of which was was better. Different cameras will produce different results, that's not too hard to understand. Now it's always up to the end user to decide if he's got enough spending money left to get the one he wants. And it's a strictly personal decision. Where things heat up is when someone tries to become a preacher for a sensor or another brand. This I find annoying.
 
Top