WhiteLight
Senior Member
The 50mm f/1.8 is easily found cheap. Would you suggest that? Is it considered low light or do I really need to get the 1.4? That small aperture difference makes a huge money difference. Is the extra speed worth it?
The only difference been the 35 and 50mm's is the focal distance and the field of view. I have the 35mm and my friend had the 50mm so I've tried that too on my d5100 which is a crop sensor.
Your main gripe about the 50mm would be the limited area you can cover.
But if you are looking at shooting portraits mainly, then the 50mm is the way to go.
This lens wouldn't do well if you are shooting a group or you want anything that's slightly wide-ish.
What lend do you currently have?
If you have any zoom lens that covers both 50 and 35mm, put it on.
Take pics at both 50mm and 35mm on the zoom and you'll know what seems better in terms of field of view.
Quality wise both are great
The 1.8s are definitely low light specialists
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk