Hi all, You can add me to the list of D90 users! lol

Bill16

Senior Member
I'm finding the ability for much quicker adjustments in your setting on the D90 extremely addicting, and the battery grips for the D90 are hands down better than what I've found for the D3100 and D5100!
I would recommend the D90 over the D3100 or the D5100 when it come to comfort and the ability of quick setting changes, to anyone getting into photography beyond just occasional usage in this price range. I'm finding it easier to figure out than expected, and I'm loving not having to go into the menu so often to make needed changes.:)
But I don't think the D90 will be as good for macro as the D5100, since the D5100 has higher MPs and the flip out LCD that seem well suited to taking macro shots. I haven't had a chance to compare them for macro yet, but it seems to me that the pros of the D90 aren't needed much for macro shot. Speed of changing settings isn't as important in macro photography as the higher MPs and the flip out LCD screen can be. I also believe that if your doing a lot of point and shooting letting the Nikon control the setting, that the D5100 will tend to take better photos. But since I don't use auto mode, that doesn't matter much to me.lol :D
To me the D90 is a more professional geared model than the D5100. That I think is the real important difference between them. :D

Here's another installment of my comparison for ya my friend! :D [MENTION=11881]Moab Man[/MENTION]
 
Last edited:

06Honda

Senior Member
I am buying a new one this week at Henrys to replace my D50, don't really need 16 MP or above like the D7000 and D7100 offer. Should be a fairly easy learning curve as the menus are well laid out. Coupled with my 80-400VR looking forward to some nature shots.
 

Bill16

Senior Member
Congrats! I hope you'll love it! :D
I am buying a new one this week at Henrys to replace my D50, don't really need 16 MP or above like the D7000 and D7100 offer. Should be a fairly easy learning curve as the menus are well laid out. Coupled with my 80-400VR looking forward to some nature shots.
 

skene

Senior Member
But I don't think the D90 will be as good for macro as the D5100, since the D5100 has higher MPs and the flip out LCD that seem well suited to taking macro shots.

While the D5100 has the flip out screen which would make awkward shots easier to take... The D90 would be no worse just because you are unable to flip a screen.
It's all about the photographer at that point.

jelly1.jpg

jelly3.jpg


jelly2.jpg


favia.jpg
 

Bill16

Senior Member
Lol I wasn't downgrading the D90! Lol I was finding a good use for my D5100, that I think it will work very well for out of my Nikon's. :)
Being disabled, I count the flip out screen and the higher mp count to be a plus for macro for me. :)
But my primary Nikon has now became my D90, for all the reasons I stated before. :D

But I sure enjoy seeing your work! Very cool shots! :D
 

skene

Senior Member
Well when you start thinking about counting MPs.... it helps, but I wouldn't go crazy thinking about it. A proper macro lens would be a bit more crucial so that you can zoom into things... 1:1 magnification is needed... for going pretty deep in magnifying items.
 

Bill16

Senior Member
A nikkor 105mm macro AF lens is at the top of my lens wish list. :D
Well when you start thinking about counting MPs.... it helps, but I wouldn't go crazy thinking about it. A proper macro lens would be a bit more crucial so that you can zoom into things... 1:1 magnification is needed... for going pretty deep in magnifying items.
 

skene

Senior Member
The 105 is a great lens. I wish that I could pick one up, however I have 2 macro lenses that I already use and do exactly what I need. The 40mm 2.8G and 85mm 3.5G.

No magic here (as I roll up my sleeves)... I take pictures of fish and corals...
 

Bill16

Senior Member
Cool! I love my old 105mm micro lens, but I am so eager to get the newer 105mm micro with 1:1lens. It will have to be a used lens, but cost is a big consideration for me.But since basically I just started taking photos when I joined nikonites, I'm pleased with how things are going so far! :D
The 105 is a great lens. I wish that I could pick one up, however I have 2 macro lenses that I already use and do exactly what I need. The 40mm 2.8G and 85mm 3.5G.

No magic here (as I roll up my sleeves)... I take pictures of fish and corals...
 

skene

Senior Member
Cool! I love my old 105mm micro lens, but I am so eager to get the newer 105mm micro with 1:1lens. It will have to be a used lens, but cost is a big consideration for me.But since basically I just started taking photos when I joined nikonites, I'm pleased with how things are going so far! :D

You could always sell off one of the other cameras you have to help fund the 105mm. They are great lenses for the money... and more than likely one of the other 2 cameras will end up finding their way onto a shelf. If you have a D3100 and 5100, no need to keep both, as they are both very similar to each other. The D5100 would be a keeper over the D3100. Remind yourself that you only have 2 hands... :p
@WhiteLight... Thanks.
 

Bill16

Senior Member
I think my wife might end up with the D3100. But I can see what you mean. The D3100 will be less used if I keep it for myself.
 

Bill16

Senior Member
I'm sure you can find more detailed comparisons, but I have to say if I could only have one or the other, that I would pick the D90 at this point. I believe the build quality of the D90 is better, and that the professional type setup more than makes up for any positives the D5100 has over it. Knowing what I know so far, I would have bought the D90 as my first Nikon had I known!
I believe this D90 is the best Nikon I own so far, and when I upgrade I'll be looking at the D300s or the D700 depending on my budget if I can't get the D4 yet.

I'm not knocking the D5100, but I feel if your wanting a great quality Nikon at a reasonable price with a pro feel, the D90 fills the bill better than the D5100.
But if lighter weight, better video, higher mps, and a flip out lcd are some of what your looking for, then then you can't go wrong with the D5100! It's a very cool nikon and I don't regret buying one at all. :D
Would love to hear about a comparison between your D5100 and the D90.
 

Bill16

Senior Member
Well it's official. My wife says no to selling the D3100. Lol She says that when she wants to use a DSLR that she wants to keep the D3100 for herself to use. I'll likely have to take the battery grip off of it and put the kit lens on it to lighten it up for her whenever she wants to use it, to make it lighter. But she did buy it for my birthday so I wasn't surprised that she wasn't about to say OK to selling it anyway! Lol :)

My wife has been sooooo awesome to me and soooo supportive of my photography, that I can't find a thing to complain about when it comes to my wife! :D

The truth is I may wind up with quite a collection of Nikon's and lenses over time to enjoy, and I don't think I'll mind a bit! Lol :D

You could always sell off one of the other cameras you have to help fund the 105mm. They are great lenses for the money... and more than likely one of the other 2 cameras will end up finding their way onto a shelf. If you have a D3100 and 5100, no need to keep both, as they are both very similar to each other. The D5100 would be a keeper over the D3100. Remind yourself that you only have 2 hands... :p
@WhiteLight... Thanks.
 

Deezey

Senior Member
Welcome to the family within the family Bill! I chose the D90 as my first dSLR and I absolutely love this thing. While I did get to fondle the others (3xxx, 5xxx) the D90 just seemed to fit me better.

While yes the MPs are not the highest....and seem to be pretty low compared to the newest gear out there. I have grown to enjoy the challenge of getting into the proper range for my shots. And not over using the crop post processing.

I picked up a cheep $30 dual battery grip and a spare battery.
Both have performed flawlessly.
Sent from my SCH-I405 using Tapatalk 2
 
Top