I currently have the 24-120F4 and it's a great lens. I actually chose it over the 24-70 as it's more versatile for my actual use with the extra range and VR. I'm sure at some point in the future I'll convince myself that I need the 24-70
My current dilemma is that we are planning a three week trip to the States next year and I'm trying to decide what gear to take. I could replace the 24-120, 70-200 2.8 and TC-20e with the 28-300. That said I just don't know how how much I would use the long end. Also 24mm is really useful on FX. And when I get back either the 28-300 or 24-120 would end up as my walkabout so one would stay at home all the time. I hate to think that the 24-120 wouldn't get much use as it's a great lens.
I guess the question is, could you justify owning both lenses. If the 28-300 was so good I suppose the 24-120 could eventually turn into a 24-70 2.8. Decisions, decisions!!!
I guess the question is, could you justify owning both lenses. If the 28-300 was so good I suppose the 24-120 could eventually turn into a 24-70 2.8. Decisions, decisions!!!