I hope to pick up the Nikon 55-300mm 4.5 soon. My dilema is should I hold onto the 55-200 VR 4.0? I could trade it in at the local shop and get $100 off another lens, I paid $149 for it when I bought my D3100 a few months ago. I can't decide if I should keep it or not. The money really isn't an issue, but I hate to hold onto something I may not use again.
Pros for keeping it- It is a little faster (I live in a gloomy climate). It is significantly smaller.
Cons- Would I really notice the difference between f4 and 4.5? Is the size difference really a big deal?
For those of you that have owned both, is there anything you miss about the 55-200?
Would appreciate any feedback, Thanks!
Pros for keeping it- It is a little faster (I live in a gloomy climate). It is significantly smaller.
Cons- Would I really notice the difference between f4 and 4.5? Is the size difference really a big deal?
For those of you that have owned both, is there anything you miss about the 55-200?
Would appreciate any feedback, Thanks!