Sigma 70-200/2.8

hark

hark

Administrator
Staff member
Super Mod
I had one that I purchased new but ultimately traded it in for the Nikon version. Mine both front and rear focused plus the images looked extremely flat. There was a big difference in image quality between it and my current Nikon. Mine might have been a bad copy. I also have a Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 (the non-VR version) that is fantastic so I don't have anything against Sigma.

Like I said, it might have just been my copy. I had the option to send it in to Sigma for repair but decided to trade it in. That said...I've seen some excellent images here taken with that lens.
 
J

Just-Clayton

Senior Member
if i get it new and try it out, i figure i could send it back.


hark said:
I had one that I purchased new but ultimately traded it in for the Nikon version. Mine both front and rear focused plus the images looked extremely flat. There was a big difference in image quality between it and my current Nikon. Mine might have been a bad copy. I also have a Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 (the non-VR version) that is fantastic so I don't have anything against Sigma.

Like I said, it might have just been my copy. I had the option to send it in to Sigma for repair but decided to trade it in. That said...I've seen some excellent images here taken with that lens.
Click to expand...
 
Top