Hello everyone...
I was on some concert last night, shooting for my self with D7100 and Sigma 17-50 f2.8, here are some photos:
I am thinking about Nikkor 55-200 VR, but It is not a fast lens, and not very good at 200mm as I can see on various reviews, but for 160 Euro it is a steal.
I am doing some calculations here, last night I testd my D7100 at ISO 5000, 1/320 shutter speed and f2.8 aperture, and here you see the results, for my eyes it is nice, there is no too much noise, photos are usable so I am thinking about 55-200 at f5.6, I will need to lower shutter speed to 1/80 and raise ISO to 6400 to get the same exposure.
What are your thoughts, is that 55-200 usable at all, or worth what it costs?
Maybe Sigma 50-200?
I was on some concert last night, shooting for my self with D7100 and Sigma 17-50 f2.8, here are some photos:
I am thinking about Nikkor 55-200 VR, but It is not a fast lens, and not very good at 200mm as I can see on various reviews, but for 160 Euro it is a steal.
I am doing some calculations here, last night I testd my D7100 at ISO 5000, 1/320 shutter speed and f2.8 aperture, and here you see the results, for my eyes it is nice, there is no too much noise, photos are usable so I am thinking about 55-200 at f5.6, I will need to lower shutter speed to 1/80 and raise ISO to 6400 to get the same exposure.
What are your thoughts, is that 55-200 usable at all, or worth what it costs?
Maybe Sigma 50-200?
Last edited: