Simple question.

Blacktop

Senior Member
If I get a 35mm AF-S 1.8G lens, will I miss my 50mm 1.8D AF lens?:confused:

The only thing I really use the 50mm is for some flower shots, and some indoor stuff chasing Daisy The Rottweiler around with.

I can't keep both, so don't suggest it.
 

Eyelight

Senior Member
The only thing I can offer is that you can pluck a 50mm picture from the middle of a 35mm picture, but you can't pluck a 35 from the middle of a 50.
 

BackdoorArts

Senior Member
If your list of lenses in your signature is complete then I would be inclined to say, "Go for the 35mm". It gives you something you don't have, a wide angle (which isn't really "wide" on a DX), and you've got nearly the same perspective on your 55-200mm zoom.
 

Bill16

Senior Member
I believe the 50mm maybe slightly sharper, but I think the 35mm is more versatile and nearly as sharp. A good flash is a great thing to add to your gear, and it will bring more out of your shots with either lens!
For a flash, I'd recommend a sb-700, sb-800, or a sb-910! I have a sb-800 that works awesome myself! :)
 

Blacktop

Senior Member
I believe the 50mm maybe slightly sharper, but I think the 35mm is more versatile and nearly as sharp. A good flash is a great thing to add to your gear, and it will bring more out of your shots with either lens!
For a flash, I'd recommend a sb-700, sb-800, or a sb-910! I have a sb-800 that works awesome myself! :)

Dude! I'm not EVEN going to get into flash photography yet. That is a whole other world of headaches I just don't need right now.:dejection:
 

Blacktop

Senior Member
If your list of lenses in your signature is complete then I would be inclined to say, "Go for the 35mm". It gives you something you don't have, a wide angle (which isn't really "wide" on a DX), and you've got nearly the same perspective on your 55-200mm zoom.

I have a friend whose name I won't mention (it rhymes with Will Schmisteen) who is sending me his 18-55 kit lens that he doesn't like so I can have my beloved 18-55 back which I sold with my D3100. Thanks Will Schmisteen!

In return I'm going to send Will Schmisteen (or is it Bill16? I forget now) my 50mm 1.8D lens that he is lusting after.
So that is why I'm thinking of the 35MM, since I've heard so many good things about it.
 

Blacktop

Senior Member
I went to the 35mm 2 months ago, and I rarely use the 18-55 or the 55-200.
No regrets.

You probably weren't using your 55-200 that much to begin with then. Thanks, from what I've been reading online about the 35 I think I'm just gonna go ahead and get that one.
Probably going to get it new, since it seems that the used prices are only a few dollars less anyway.
 

SteveL54

Senior Member
You probably weren't using your 55-200 that much to begin with then. Thanks, from what I've been reading online about the 35 I think I'm just gonna go ahead and get that one.
Probably going to get it new, since it seems that the used prices are only a few dollars less anyway.

I actually used it quite a bit at first, but there's only so much you can do in that range. It still goes on when I need to reach 200.
And as much as some people aren't thrilled with the 18-55 kit lens, I still enjoy that one.

But that 35mm just does the job. And it does it well. I agree with new. Mine was $196 from B&H, and I'm so close, it arrived the next day.
 

aroy

Senior Member
I use 35mm F1.8 for low light or when I need it wide open. Same is the case with my 50mm F1.8 AF. Rest of the time when the need is for good DOF and I will be shooting at F4+, it is the 18-55. It is light, sharp and the best part is that it focuses the closest - a part time macro for me.
 

STM

Senior Member
If you plan to do any portraiture, than I would stick with the 50mm. 35mm, although equivalent roughly to a 50mm on DX, will add perspective distortion to the image and make it somewhat unflattering. Again, it all depends on what kind of photography you plan to do.
 
Top