Mineores
Senior Member
It's Christmas soon, and my father said that he wants to get me a Telephoto my D3200. I was looking at those two lenses above
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Nikon-AF-S-NIKKOR-55-300mm-4-5-5-6G/dp/B003ZSHNCC/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1384190153&sr=8-2&keywords=nikon+70-300mm
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Tamron-AF-70-300mm-4-5-6-Macro/dp/B000HDZAUA
What's the real difference between both of them? I discounted the Sigma 70-300mm as I found out the AF won't work as this lens doesn't have a motor? Will the Tamron be compatible with my D3200 (I mean will all features be available). Is the Nikon really worth the extra £60 - £80?
Also, changing the subject, what is the best lens for landscape photos, not too expensive please!
Sorry if I sound a little clueless, only got this DSLR a couple of weeks ago, and photography involves a steep learning curve.
thanks in advance for your help!
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Nikon-AF-S-NIKKOR-55-300mm-4-5-5-6G/dp/B003ZSHNCC/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1384190153&sr=8-2&keywords=nikon+70-300mm
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Tamron-AF-70-300mm-4-5-6-Macro/dp/B000HDZAUA
What's the real difference between both of them? I discounted the Sigma 70-300mm as I found out the AF won't work as this lens doesn't have a motor? Will the Tamron be compatible with my D3200 (I mean will all features be available). Is the Nikon really worth the extra £60 - £80?
Also, changing the subject, what is the best lens for landscape photos, not too expensive please!
Sorry if I sound a little clueless, only got this DSLR a couple of weeks ago, and photography involves a steep learning curve.
thanks in advance for your help!