hello all, well after looking at all the amazing macro photos on here i'm thinking of getting one, the question is which one. nikkor 105 or sigma 105. or the 85mm of both makes. I've got a d7000 with 2 kit lens,50mm 1.8 10mm fisheye, 12-24mm and 70-300 mm not the 2.8 one
Now Im starting get into potrait a little bit and seen that this is a very good choice. would this will be true on the d7000 or would the conversation factor, taking it upto some where near the 150mm mark make to much and in which case would an 85mm macro suit my uses better as it works out to 105mm i think. Of course I would use it for macro and i've seen that there is little differance in the min focus distance for both sizes with the 105 being about 10mm further away than the 85.
Ive seen a review in this months digital camera( i think )and they say the sigma is a better lens..... so dear friends... who's got what and what do you think of them...
thanks for the help in spending my hard earned money LOL.
Ed
Now Im starting get into potrait a little bit and seen that this is a very good choice. would this will be true on the d7000 or would the conversation factor, taking it upto some where near the 150mm mark make to much and in which case would an 85mm macro suit my uses better as it works out to 105mm i think. Of course I would use it for macro and i've seen that there is little differance in the min focus distance for both sizes with the 105 being about 10mm further away than the 85.
Ive seen a review in this months digital camera( i think )and they say the sigma is a better lens..... so dear friends... who's got what and what do you think of them...
thanks for the help in spending my hard earned money LOL.
Ed