Serious question here guys.
I asked in a previous thread about a new camera or rather about the ability to have clean images from about 6400 iso or a little higher.
This question is sort of linked to that but in an adjacent way.
Why do the vast majority of professionals use FX rather than DX?
Ive been reading how the new d500 even with a DX sensor is knocking some of the 'pro' cameras into touch especially the d750 which is FX.
I understand about build quality but apparently the d500 is pretty tough. So is this camera an exception to the build quality rule or is there a vast advantage to having a FX camera?
I asked in a previous thread about a new camera or rather about the ability to have clean images from about 6400 iso or a little higher.
This question is sort of linked to that but in an adjacent way.
Why do the vast majority of professionals use FX rather than DX?
Ive been reading how the new d500 even with a DX sensor is knocking some of the 'pro' cameras into touch especially the d750 which is FX.
I understand about build quality but apparently the d500 is pretty tough. So is this camera an exception to the build quality rule or is there a vast advantage to having a FX camera?