drummerJ99
Senior Member
Hello fellow Nikon users. I'm in a bit of a delimma, I currently have a D3200 that I've taken about 6000 photos on and has been great for a starter camera. I also have the 18-55 kit lens, 50mm 1.8 and a Tamron 70-300. I think I have found that I like shooting wildlife, landscapes and sports/motorsports the best.
My problem comes from in great light 70-300 does good. If lighting conditions isn't great and it bumps iso up to 1600+ it becomes pretty soft with noise. Alot of moforsports starts off with great light and by end of the night your under horrible track lights. I'm trying to decide is my limiting factor the Tamron 70-300 or the D3200?
So I'm thinking about upgrading. Which do you think wound benefit me more?:
Upgrading body to a 7200, which I really like due to weather proofing or upgrading the lens to something like either the Sigma 150-600? I like the sport version best due the weatherproofing but also has a hefty price tag compared to the contemporary version.
Which would you guys recommend first? Lens or body?
Thanks,
Jeffrey
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
My problem comes from in great light 70-300 does good. If lighting conditions isn't great and it bumps iso up to 1600+ it becomes pretty soft with noise. Alot of moforsports starts off with great light and by end of the night your under horrible track lights. I'm trying to decide is my limiting factor the Tamron 70-300 or the D3200?
So I'm thinking about upgrading. Which do you think wound benefit me more?:
Upgrading body to a 7200, which I really like due to weather proofing or upgrading the lens to something like either the Sigma 150-600? I like the sport version best due the weatherproofing but also has a hefty price tag compared to the contemporary version.
Which would you guys recommend first? Lens or body?
Thanks,
Jeffrey
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk