Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photo Evaluation
Zoom detail fell short
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BF Hammer" data-source="post: 836892" data-attributes="member: 48483"><p>I know this is turning into old news, but I remembered I have a 2nd exif viewer installed. Some extra details...</p><p></p><p>FILE PROPERTIES</p><p></p><p>[ ./ ]</p><p>Content-type: image/jpeg</p><p>Size: 450402 bytes (439.85 KB)</p><p>Last modified: Mon, 08 Sep 2025 00:22:59 GMT</p><p>Dimensions: 2289x2079 pixels</p><p></p><p>IMAGE META DATA</p><p></p><p>Date: 2019-06-16 15:04:45 -0400</p><p>Creator: RICHARD GERMANY</p><p>Make: NIKON CORPORATION</p><p>Model: NIKON D850</p><p>Lens: 70.0-300.0 mm f/4.5-5.6</p><p>Focal Length: 135mm, 135mm (35mm equivalent)</p><p>Aperture: ƒ/7.1</p><p>Exposure Time: 0.0020s (1/500)</p><p>ISO equivalent: 400</p><p>Flash Fired: No</p><p>White Balance: Auto</p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 18px">Distance: Infinite</span></strong></p><p>Software: Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.1 (Windows)</p><p>Exposure: aperture priority (semi-auto)</p><p>Exposure Bias: none</p><p>Metering Mode: Matrix</p><p>Focal Length: 135</p><p>Color Space: sRGB</p><p>Focal Length (35mm): 135</p><p>LensModel: 70.0-300.0 mm f/4.5-5.6</p><p>Preserved Filename: _DSC0518.JPG</p><p></p><p>It looks like the recorded focal distance was at infinity. I am guessing that was a near-miss on focus and it should be just a bit shorter than that. Otherwise I cannot criticize the exposure choices much. I think I would have accepted a higher ISO with Auto-ISO active and taken a higher f-stop more like f/11. On my D750 I'm willing to take photos at ISO 3200 in some situations, ISO 1600 anytime.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BF Hammer, post: 836892, member: 48483"] I know this is turning into old news, but I remembered I have a 2nd exif viewer installed. Some extra details... FILE PROPERTIES [ ./ ] Content-type: image/jpeg Size: 450402 bytes (439.85 KB) Last modified: Mon, 08 Sep 2025 00:22:59 GMT Dimensions: 2289x2079 pixels IMAGE META DATA Date: 2019-06-16 15:04:45 -0400 Creator: RICHARD GERMANY Make: NIKON CORPORATION Model: NIKON D850 Lens: 70.0-300.0 mm f/4.5-5.6 Focal Length: 135mm, 135mm (35mm equivalent) Aperture: ƒ/7.1 Exposure Time: 0.0020s (1/500) ISO equivalent: 400 Flash Fired: No White Balance: Auto [B][SIZE=5]Distance: Infinite[/SIZE][/B] Software: Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.1 (Windows) Exposure: aperture priority (semi-auto) Exposure Bias: none Metering Mode: Matrix Focal Length: 135 Color Space: sRGB Focal Length (35mm): 135 LensModel: 70.0-300.0 mm f/4.5-5.6 Preserved Filename: _DSC0518.JPG It looks like the recorded focal distance was at infinity. I am guessing that was a near-miss on focus and it should be just a bit shorter than that. Otherwise I cannot criticize the exposure choices much. I think I would have accepted a higher ISO with Auto-ISO active and taken a higher f-stop more like f/11. On my D750 I'm willing to take photos at ISO 3200 in some situations, ISO 1600 anytime. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photo Evaluation
Zoom detail fell short
Top
