Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Prime
Zeiss 135mm f/2.0 Apo-Sonnar ZF.2 Lens
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gqtuazon" data-source="post: 276764" data-attributes="member: 6573"><p>I would suggest that you "rent" the 135mm f2 and 200mm f2 if you are going to invest on these lenses. The problem is, if and once you have both, you will probably want both which is not good for your wallet. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /> I will eventually get the Nikon 200mm f2 in the future.</p><p></p><p>This is more of a personal choice since some people are good in using MF and some are not depending on their skill and eyesight. Most Nikon 200mm f2 owners that I know rarely use their lens after the honey moon period because of its bulk, it attracts unneccessary attention, and occupies or requires it's own bag. I wouldn't use the 135mm on a wedding unless you are a second shooter and you have time to focus while the couples are not moving much. IT is great for studio work.</p><p></p><p>IQ wise, I think they are very good. Same goes with the Bokeh when you shoot at minimum focusing distance. I am now more biased with the Zeiss due to its portability. My eye sight is still 20/20 since I had Lasik done with both of my eyes 7 years ago.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gqtuazon, post: 276764, member: 6573"] I would suggest that you "rent" the 135mm f2 and 200mm f2 if you are going to invest on these lenses. The problem is, if and once you have both, you will probably want both which is not good for your wallet. :D I will eventually get the Nikon 200mm f2 in the future. This is more of a personal choice since some people are good in using MF and some are not depending on their skill and eyesight. Most Nikon 200mm f2 owners that I know rarely use their lens after the honey moon period because of its bulk, it attracts unneccessary attention, and occupies or requires it's own bag. I wouldn't use the 135mm on a wedding unless you are a second shooter and you have time to focus while the couples are not moving much. IT is great for studio work. IQ wise, I think they are very good. Same goes with the Bokeh when you shoot at minimum focusing distance. I am now more biased with the Zeiss due to its portability. My eye sight is still 20/20 since I had Lasik done with both of my eyes 7 years ago. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Prime
Zeiss 135mm f/2.0 Apo-Sonnar ZF.2 Lens
Top