Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Mirrorless Z
Z5/Z5ii/Z5iiC
Z5ii, FTZII and AF-S Nikkor 200-500 (5.6e) ED VR lens
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Clovishound" data-source="post: 848673" data-attributes="member: 50197"><p>I used a 200-500 with an FTZ on a Z5, Z7ii and Z8. I never had any issues with autofocus, other than poor AF on the Z7ii with birds in flight. That was the camera, not the lens. I upgraded to the 180-600 nearly a year ago. I found that AF was a little better, but not by much. My advice, for what it's worth, is to go with the 180-600. If you already had the 200-500, that advice might be different. Look at my post in your other thread for a breakdown of the 100-400 and 180-600. The 200-500 is no longer sold by Nikon, I did see that B&H is still selling them new at $1200. Of course, you have to add $300 for the FTZ. That would bring this combo to $1500 vs $2100 for the 180-600. </p><p></p><p>I initially bought the 200-500 because there were no affordable Z mount long teles at the time. My opinion is that the 200-500 is a very good, sharp lens for the money, and it served me well for several years on my Z cameras. It is, however, an older design, and the newer Z lenses are definitely a step up.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Clovishound, post: 848673, member: 50197"] I used a 200-500 with an FTZ on a Z5, Z7ii and Z8. I never had any issues with autofocus, other than poor AF on the Z7ii with birds in flight. That was the camera, not the lens. I upgraded to the 180-600 nearly a year ago. I found that AF was a little better, but not by much. My advice, for what it's worth, is to go with the 180-600. If you already had the 200-500, that advice might be different. Look at my post in your other thread for a breakdown of the 100-400 and 180-600. The 200-500 is no longer sold by Nikon, I did see that B&H is still selling them new at $1200. Of course, you have to add $300 for the FTZ. That would bring this combo to $1500 vs $2100 for the 180-600. I initially bought the 200-500 because there were no affordable Z mount long teles at the time. My opinion is that the 200-500 is a very good, sharp lens for the money, and it served me well for several years on my Z cameras. It is, however, an older design, and the newer Z lenses are definitely a step up. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Mirrorless Z
Z5/Z5ii/Z5iiC
Z5ii, FTZII and AF-S Nikkor 200-500 (5.6e) ED VR lens
Top