Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon Compact Digital Cameras
Non-Nikon Cameras
Your thoughts
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BF Hammer" data-source="post: 813251" data-attributes="member: 48483"><p>Yeah, at 50mm it would be disappointing. Those kind of images are normally shot at 24mm or wider, and f/2.8 or wider if available.</p><p></p><p>But the secret is that you don't do it with a single exposure. Between the movement of the earth making the stars turn into trails and the need of long time exposure, you have to take dozens of photos and use software that will align the images with each other and combine the light in an additive way while averaging out the noise. At 20mm you are pretty much limited to 10-12 second exposures before you get motion blurring in the stars, at 50mm it is more like 4-5 seconds. That is from a tripod, if you use a star tracker on the tripod you can increase the times but get motion blurs in the foreground image.</p><p></p><p>And astrophotography is never about what the naked eye can see. It is always an exaggeration and enhancement of what is present but invisible. You can see a faint Milky Way in a dark sky, but it is never like the photos you see.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BF Hammer, post: 813251, member: 48483"] Yeah, at 50mm it would be disappointing. Those kind of images are normally shot at 24mm or wider, and f/2.8 or wider if available. But the secret is that you don't do it with a single exposure. Between the movement of the earth making the stars turn into trails and the need of long time exposure, you have to take dozens of photos and use software that will align the images with each other and combine the light in an additive way while averaging out the noise. At 20mm you are pretty much limited to 10-12 second exposures before you get motion blurring in the stars, at 50mm it is more like 4-5 seconds. That is from a tripod, if you use a star tracker on the tripod you can increase the times but get motion blurs in the foreground image. And astrophotography is never about what the naked eye can see. It is always an exaggeration and enhancement of what is present but invisible. You can see a faint Milky Way in a dark sky, but it is never like the photos you see. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon Compact Digital Cameras
Non-Nikon Cameras
Your thoughts
Top